Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v 1. Ken Mutugi Muchagi & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA H.C.CR MURDER NO. 18 OF 2015 REPUBLIC......................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS 1. KEN MUTUGI MUCHAGI....... 1ST ACCUSED 2. ROSE MADRINE NJERI..........2ND ACCUSED RULING This ruling relates to an application for bail made orally by the 2 nd accused Rose Madrin Njeri. The court was urged to consider that the report by the probation officer was favourable. The state through the Prosecution Counsel Mr. Ombiri did not oppose the application. He urged the court to grant bail on such terms that the court may deem necessary. I have considered the application. I have perused the bail report by the Probation Officer. I note that bail is recommended at courts discretion. Bail is provided for under Article 49(h) of the Constitution provides: “An arrested person has the right – to be released on bond bail on reasonable conditions pending a charge or trial unless there are compelling reasons not to be released.” The prosecution has not cited any compelling reasons to deny the 2 nd accused bail. The state has informed the Court to consider such terms as may be necessary. Bail is a Constitution right which should not be denied unless there are compelling reasons. However in considering the bail terms, the court notes that the offence facing the 2 nd accused is very serious and the terms must be such that they will ensure that the accused will turn up for the trial upto its final determination. The accused will be released on a bond of Kshs 5,000,000/- plus two sureties of Kshs 2,000,000/- each. Dated at Kerugoya this 1ST day of August 2018. L. W. GITARI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.