REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION UNDER ARTICLE 165 (3) 2, 10, 19, 20 (1) (2) (3) (4), 21 AND 22 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (2010) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ENSHRINED IN CHAPTER HOUR OF THE CONSTITUTION IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLES 27, 28, 29, 31, 40 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (2010) AND IN THE MATTER OF NATIONAL GOVERNMENT CO-ORDINATION ACT (CHAPTER 183 LAWS OF KENYA), THE CHIEFS’ ACT (CHAPTER 128 LAWS OF KENYA), NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE ACT (ACT NO 11A OF 2011) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (PROTECTIION OF RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES, 2013) AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 118, 119, 120 AND 121 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT (CHAMPTER 75 LAWS OF KENYA) IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN TIMOTHY MAUNDA MBITI ......................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS WINSTON KIAMBI MURUNGI, THE DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONER BUTULA SUB-COUNTY ................................................................. 1 ST RESPONDENT PAUL ROP, THE DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONER SAMIA/FUNYULA SUB-COUNTY .............................................. 2 ND RESPONDENT
page 1 of 2
JAMES KARERI THUO, THE ASSISTANT COUNT COMMISSIONER FUNYULA DIVISION .................................................................... 3 RD RESPONDENT THE DCIO BUTULA POLICE DIVISION .................................. 4TH RESPONDENT THE OCS BUMALA POLICE STATION .................................... 5 TH RESPONDENT THE OCS FUNYULA POLICE STATION .................................. 6 TH RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ...................................................... 7 TH RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS .................... 8TH RESPONDENT RULING I have considered the application by the applicant under certificate of urgency. I am satisfied that the matter is urgent and ought to be considered expeditiously and exparte in the first instance I certify the matter as urgent and direct that it be considered during the Recess. On the prayers in the Chamber Summons, I note that the applicant has not sought any temporary orders – All the prayers seek for substantive mandatory orders which can only mode at the interpartes stage. Accordingly, I direct the Applicant to serve the Respondents with the application for interpartes consideration before Hon. Riech, J., in Bungoma High Court, being the Regional duty Judge on 4.9.2018. Orders Accordingly, Dated, Signed And Delivered at Siaya This 31st Day of August, 2018. R. E. ABURILI JUDGE
page 2 of 2