Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v David Gitari Karoki

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA MURDER CASE NO. 6 OF 2017 REPUBLIC.........................................................APPLICANT VERSUS DAVID GITARI KAROKI............................RESPONDENT RULING The accused person David Gitari Kariuki filed a notice of motion under Article 49(1) and 50(2) of the Constitution seeking an order that he be granted bond/bail pending the hearing and determination of this suit. The state did not oppose the application. Bail is a constitutional right which an accused person is free to enjoy unless there are compelling reasons not to release an accused on bail. Article 49(1)(h) of the constitution provides: “An arrested person has the right – To be released on bond or bail on reasonable conditions, pending a charge or trial unless there are compelling reasons not to be released.” A pre-bail report was filed in court by J.M. Masavi County Probation Officer. Safe for the victims relatives who are still traumatized at what happened to one of their own, there is no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail. Bail is recommended as the accused has strong family and community ties, has a fixed abode and has supportive family which is willing to stand surety for him. In view of these I will grant the accused bail. I order that the accused be released on a bond of Kshs 2,000,000/- plus one like surety. He will be required to attend court as directed until the case is finalized. Dated at Kerugoya this 20th Day of September 2018. L. W. GITARI JUDGE Read out in open court, Accused – Present M/s Muthoni S/C. C/A – Naomi This 20th September 2018. L. W. GITARI

page 1 of 2

JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.