Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

John Mwangi Maina & 2 others v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.78 OF 2016 JOHN MWANGI MAINA....................................................................1 ST APPELLANT MARTIN K.WAMWEA......................................................................2 ND APPELLANT SIMON WACHIRA KAGIRI.............................................................3 RD APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC...............................................................................................RESPONDENT RULING The only issue before me is whether the fines and the penalties deposited by the appellants herein ought to be released to them following their discharge on the 12th June 2018. In my judgment I made the finding that the prosecution still had the opportunity to bring proper charges against the appellants. No charge has been brought except that the state has filed an appeal. In sentencing the appellants, the learned trial magistrate had made the following orders: i. Each accused is sentenced to pay a fine of Ksh. 400,000/- in default 1-year imprisonment. ii. In addition, being a mandatory sentence each accused is sentenced to twice the amount lost by the County Government calculated at Kshs. 7,513,924/00 in default to serve 3 years’ imprisonment. iii. Sentences to run consecutively. Cash bail deposited herein be released to the depositors. In opposing the application for the release of the fines paid to the appellants Mr. Magoma for the DPP submitted that the office of the DPP had filed an appeal against this court’s judgment discharging the appellants. Counsel for the appellants were of the view that no application had been made to stay the release of the said monies to the appellants pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. In the end Mr. Magoma left it to the court. While the discharge of an accused person does not bar the ODPP from bringing fresh charges against the same accused on the same facts, the accused person is basically free until the moment that ‘sword of Damocles’ lands on him and he is arraigned in court. There being no application for stay of the release of the monies to the appellants, and there being no orders of stay, there is no justifiable reason to continue holding the said monies. I allow the application for the release of the fines to the appellants. Dated, delivered and signed at Nyeri in open court this 24th September 2018. Mumbua T. Matheka Judge In the presence of: C/A Albert

page 1 of 2

Mr. Ng’ang’a for 1st appellant, also for holding brief for Mr. Nderitu for 2nd appellant, Ms. Nyakio Munene holding brief for Muchiri was Gathoni for 3rd appellant Mr. Magoma for the state

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.