Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Wilfred Murithi Kirima & 6 others v Meru County Public Service Board

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT KENYA AT MERU CONSTITUTIONAL NO. 22 OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 1,2,3, 10, 12, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 47, 49,73,80,232,259 and 260 OF THE CONSTITION OF KENYA, 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENTS ACT, ACT NO. 17 OF 2012 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE (VALUES AND PRINCIPLES) ACT, 2015 AND IN THE MATTER OF ONGOING RECRUITMENT BY MERU COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD BETWEEN WILFRED MURITHI KIRIMA.............................................1 ST PETITIONER DOUGLAS MBAE KIOGORA..............................................2 ND PETITIONER CHRISTOPHER MWITI.......................................................3 RD PETITIONER PATRICK KIRIGIA...............................................................4 TH PETITIONER MARTIN MWENDA..............................................................5 TH PETITIONER FRANCIS CURUKIA............................................................6 TH PETITIONER ADAM YASSIN........................................................................7 TH PETITIONER VERSUS MERU COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD........................RESPONDENT RULING Wilfred Murithi Kiremia and 6 others filed this petition on 31.7.2018 under certificate of urgency seeking that the court grants Conservatory orders barring the Respondent from 13th August 2018 as per list of shortlisted candidates for various positions advertised has been publicized. The application is supported by the ground on the face of the application and supporting affidavit of Wilfred Murithi Kirima. The Petition (Grounds of the petition Constitutional Violations) as well as prayers being sought in the petition. Annexed to the application is a publication of the vacancies being sought to be filled by the County Government of Meru Public Service Board and Interview list and schedule of interviews for various positions. The Respondents filed a Reply to the Petition and application as well as preliminary objection arguing that this court doesn’t have

page 1 of 2

jurisdiction to deal/preside over this matter that relates to Employment and Labour Relations Court. The Preliminary objection is opposed for reasons that petition relates to breach and/or violations of the constitution. As rightly submitted the jurisdiction of this court is provided for under Article 165 (3) & (4) Article 165 (3) & (4). Article 165 5(b) excludes High court’s jurisdiction in respect of matters falling within the jurisdiction of the courts contemplated in Article 162 (2) of the constitution i.e Employment and Labour Relations court and Environment and Land Court. I have considered the preliminary objection and find that this petition herein obviously relates to Employment/recruitment and should be tried by the special court created under Article 162 (2) of the Constitution. In consideration of this courts authority under Article 159(2). The Deputy Registrar is therefore directed to send a runner to the Employment & Labour Relations court in Nairobi and place this file before the duty Judge for consideration under certificate of urgency. The costs of such running shall be borne by the Petitioner. HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE RULING DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018 IN THE PRESENCE OF: C/A:- Penina Petitioner:- Mr. Kiogora Adv for Petitioners Respondent: Mr. Mwirigi Adv for Respondent HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.