Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stephen Ochieng Onyong’a v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KIAMBU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2018 STEPHEN OCHIENG ONYONG’A.....APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC...........................................RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 7553 of 2015 of the Chief Magistrate’s court at Thika RULING 1. The Appellant, Stephen Ochieng Onyong’a was tried for the offence of Defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act. The particulars stated that on 29 th December, 2015 at [particulars withheld] in Thika Distriict within Kiambu County he caused his penis to penetrate the vagina of A.M. a child aged 8 years. There was an alternative count of committing an indecent act with a child contrary to Section 11(1) of the Sexual Offences Act, based on the same facts at the close of the trial the Appellant was convicted on the alternative count and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. 2. On 26th April 2017, he applied for leave to appeal out of time. The Application was allowed by this court and his Petition of appeal admitted on 8th May 2018. The appeal was set down for hearing on 9/7/18 in light of the fact that the Appellant appeared to be ailing and was bound to a wheel chair. On the morning of the hearing, the Appellant informed the court that he had filed submissions and the state indicated that the DPP did not oppose the appeal. 3. It turns out that what the Appellant had lodged was an application seeking re-sentencing. The submissions annexed relate to the sentence only, the Appellant stating in the first paragraph that he wished to abandon his appeal and substitute it with an application for resentencing. Evidently, the DPP was unaware of the withdrawal of the appeal and it is not clear whether the new application lodged within the appeal was served upon the DPP. 4. In the circumstances, and for the sake of good order, this court cannot proceed to write a judgment on the withdrawn appeal, or on the resentencing application. Rather, the court directs: a) That the Petition of appeal filed herein be marked as withdrawn. b) That the application filed on 9th July, 2018 be served upon the DPP together with the written submissions. c) That the said application be listed before Ngugi J on 20 th September 2018 during the service week so that it can be heard without further delay. d) For the avoidance of doubt the review application is to be heard in the miscellaneous file entitled Misc. App. No. 25 of 2017 and housed within the appeal file (HCRA 47/18). DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED THIS 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018 In the presence of: The Appellant Miss Ndumbi for the DPP C. MEOLI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.