Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ruuko ( Deceased) Stanley Rimberia v Salome Kathure Mwongera

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 128 OF 2011 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF M’MWONGERA M’WAMARU alias REUBEN MWONGERA alias MWONGERA S/O RUUKO ( DECEASED) STANLEY RIMBERIA...............................................PETITIONER VS SALOME KATHURE MWONGERA.........................PROTESTER RULING Amended Chamber summons dated 5 th June 2018 seeks that the court reviews its judgement delivered on 21 st Day of November 2017 to exclude the Respondent and her children from the list of beneficiaries on the grounds that she had benefited prior to the deceased persons death. It was argued that the applicant and his siblings would benefit from only 5 acres of land even though their house has more units. Whether the deceased held 2 acres in L.R. Abothuguchi/Katheri/1425 on behalf of Stanley Rimberia who is alleged to have purchased it is a matter that is contentested and being that is the case, this court finds that the best forum to determine that is the Environment and Land Court. In the circumstances I will review the orders of this court distributing that parcel of land pending the contesting parties moving the appropriate court to determine ownership. In the mean time the entire parcel will be held in trust by the petitioner/Administrator/ Applicant Stanley Rimberia jointly with Salome Kathure Mwongera so that this cause is closed. Costs of the application to be borne of each party. HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN COURT ON 11TH OCTOBER 2018. In the presence of: C/A: Penina Petitioner: Present in person Applicant: Represented by Lydia Mpinda HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.