REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2017 KISIMA FARM LTD........................................APPELLANT VERSUS ZACHARY MUNAMU...................................RESPONDENT RULING On 28.5.2018 Justice Majanja dismissed the appeal herein for reasons appellant had not complied with order of 11 th May 2018 to file Records of Appeal within 14 days and there was no attendance for the appellant on the material day. The appellants were condemned to pay costs of Kshs 10,000/= to the Respondents. The appellants applied that the appeal be reinstated by an application dated 20 th June 2018. The application is opposed by the Respondents. However in consideration that decretal sums was deposited and in consideration that when the appeal was dismissed the appellants filed application for reinstatement without delay and in consideration the records of appeal have been filed it is the opinion of this court that appellant should be given a chance to argue the appeal by way of written submissions. The application is allowed but the costs earlier on ordered of Kshs 10,000/= should still be paid to the Respondent as condition precedent to allowing reinstatement. Appellants have 7 days to file and serve the written submissions as well as records of appeal and also pay costs of Kshs. 10,000/=. Upon service of the Records of appeal and written submissions the Respondents will also have 7 days to file and serve their written submissions judgement in this appeal will be rendered 29.11.2018. In default of any of the condition above the appeal shall stand dismissed without recourse to the court. Orders accordingly. HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE RULING DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 HON. A.MABEYA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.