REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 233 OF 2017 MWANIKI GITAHI & PARTNES ADVOCATES....................APPLICANT VERSUS JITEGEMEE CO-OPERATIVE SAVINGS & CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED.......................RESPONDENT RULING 1. After substantially arguing his Chamber Summons dated 19/3/2018 Mr. Mwaniki sought to withdraw the said summons upon detecting some shortfalls with it. 2. The advocates for the client, Mr. Chamwada, opposed the application for withdrawal on the basis that they had responded to the same, filed papers, attended court and that it had been substantially argued. 3. This court proceeds from the learning that just as much as any litigant cannot be hindered from accessing the court system, none should be hindered from withdrawing a dispute once filed the only consideration being that on costs incurred by the other side. 4. The supreme court in Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat vs I.E.B.C & 3 Others laid that position of law when it said: “A party’s right to withdraw a matter before court cannot be taken away. A court cannot bar a party from withdrawing his matter”. 5. That being the position, I do allow the application to withdraw the chamber summons dated 19/3/2018 but noting that the matter had been opposed and therefore the respondent had incurred legal costs, I do order that the Advocate/Applicant shall pay the costs so far incurred by the client/respondent. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 24th day of October 2018. P.J.O. OTIENO JUDGE
Original judgment
Mwaniki Gitahi & Partnes Advocates v Jitegemee Co-operative Savings & Credit Society Limited
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.