Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Danson Ngaruka Muturi

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI CRIMINAL CASE NO.5 OF 2015 REPUBLIC..................................................PROSECUTION VERSUS DANSON NGARUKA MUTURI........................ACCUSED RULING By an information dated the 2nd February 2015, the accused person DANSON NGARUKA MUTURI was charged with murder contrary to S.203 as read with s. 204 of the Penal Code. It was alleged that on the night of 17th January 2015, he murdered DAVID NDONGA NGARUKA at Gathanji village, Kiaguthu sub location within Nyeri County. Plea was taken on the 11th February 2015 and the accused pleaded not guilty. On the 30th October 2018 the prosecution closed its case. The record as reproduced here below speaks for itself. The prosecution did not produce a single witness to testify against the accused person. The court was told from the bar severally that the witnesses were relatives of the accused person and would not testify. That they refused to receive summons. That they were served, appeared in court but disappeared before they could testify. In any murder trial there are categories of witnesses. There are the civilian witnesses. These may include the local administration, the area chief or assistant chief. There are the police officers- the report officer, the one who received the report, the arresting officer, the scenes of crime officer, the investigating officer. Then there are the expert witnesses: the psychiatrist, the pathologist, the government analyst. Not a single witness appeared. Warrants of arrest were applied for against the witnesses but were declined because there was no evidence of service. Though s. 92 of the CPC does not require it, it would be neither fair nor just for the court to proceed to issue a punitive order in the form of a warrant of arrest for a witness on the strength of submissions from the bar. Not a single affidavit of service was produced by anyone to show that the witnesses had indeed been served to enable the court to take any further action. The prosecution in a demonstration of utter helplessness, then closed its case. There is no evidence to consider. Just the record below. I can only make a finding of Not Guilty under s. 306(1) of the CPC. That means the accused is to be set free unless otherwise legally held. 2.2.15 Before Hon. J. Aringo-DR

page 1 of 27

Kagure –Court Clerk Accused-present Court-matter fixed for plea on 11.2.15 before the Hon. Judge CourtThe subject/accused presented to court. The arresting officer presents the suspect. The birth notification shows that he was born on 26/9/1996. He is definitely above the age of majority. The subject to be committed to remand prison till 11/2/15 when he will be presented to the judge for plea. Mention 11/2/15. J. ARINGO DR 2.2.15 11.2.15 Coram Before Justice J.Ngaah Court Clerk-Ndungu Accused-present Njue for the state Kiminda for the accused Njue-The matter is for plea. The accused is mentally fit to take plea. I am ready. Kiminda- We can take the plea. CourtThe court notes that there is a report dated 12/1/15 from a psychiatrist indicating that the accused person is mentally fit to stand trial. Court-Which language would the accused person use? Accused- Swahili language Court- The charge/information and all the elements thereof are read to the accused person interpreted in Swahili language and when asked whether it is true or not he responds: Accused-Not true Court-Plea of not guilty entered. Mention on 7/5/2015. J. NGAAH JUDGE 11.2.15 7.5.15 Coram Before Justice J. Ngaah Court Clerk-Ndungu

page 2 of 27

Accused person –present Ms. Maundu for the state Kiminda for the accused Court-is the accused person of age? Mr. Kiminda-At the time of the offence the accused had just attained the age of majority. CourtThe diaries are fully filled mention 10/6/15 before the Deputy Registrar. J. NGAAH JUDGE 7.5.15 10.6.15 Before Hon. Mutua (DR) Court- Njenda Accused-present Further mention 10.7.15. P. MUTUA DR 10.7.15 Before Hon. Mutua (DR) Court-Njenda Accused-present Further mention 11.8.15. P. MUTUA DR 11.8.15 Before Hon. Mutua (DR) Court-Gititu Accused-present Further mention 11.9.15 P. MUTUA DR 11.9.15

page 3 of 27

Before Hon. Aringo (DR) Court- Gititu Accused-present Further mention 12.10.15 J. ARINGO DR 11.9.15 12.10.15 Before Hon. Wekesa (DR) Court- Muriu Accused-present Further mention 12.11.15 C.WEKESA DR 12.10.15 12.11.15 Before Hon. Wekesa (DR) Court-Muriu Accused-present Further mention 11.12.15 C.WEKESA DR 12.11.15 11.12.15 Before Hon. Justice J. Mativo Miss Jebet for the state Mungai-Court clerk Accused Jebet for state Accused present Jebet –case is coming up for mention to take a hearing date. Accused- I ask for bond. I have suffered in jail.

page 4 of 27

Court- 1. State to file an affidavit on the bail application. 2. Probation Officer to file a pre-bail report within 2 weeks from today. 3. Mention on 24.12.15 4. Mention on 20.1.16 for hearing and determination of the bail application. J. MATIVO JUDGE 24.12.15 Before Hon. J. Wambilyanga –SRM Court clerk- Gititu State counselCourt-Case mentioned. Further mention on 20.1.16. DEPUTY REGISTRAR 29.12.15 Before Hon. C. Mburu-DR Court clerk-Nyagah State counselAccused-present Court-case mentioned. Further mention on 20/1/16. C.MBURU DR 20.1.16 Before Hon. Justice J. Mativo Miss Jebet for the state Mungai-Court clerk Accused Chebet-Coming up for a pre-bail report. I have not seen it but I rely on it. KimindaI urge the court to consider the report and the law on bail and determine. CourtI note that the pre-bail report raises fear about the safety of the accused. In view of the fears in the report, I hold the view that there are compelling reasons not to release the accused at this stage. Bail is therefore declined at this stage but may be considered later if the situation at home improves. I direct that the case be listed for hearing on an early date. Hearing on or 3/3/16. Further mention on 3/2/16.

page 5 of 27

J. MATIVO JUDGE 3.2.16 Before Hon.C.Wekesa-DR CIP Wanjau Court clerk –Muriu Accused-present Hearing on 3/3/16. C.WEKESA DR 3.3.16 3.3.16 Before Hon. Justice J. Mativo Miss Jebet for the state Mungai-Court clerk Accused Kiminda for accused Chebet for state Chebet- Not ready to proceed. The exhibits are still at the Government chemist. We are not ready to proceed without them. Kiminda- No objection. Court- Hearing on 10/6/16. Further mention 17/3/16 before Deputy Registrar. J. MATIVO JUDGE 17.3.16 Before Hon.Wekesa-DR Court clerk-Muriu Accused-present Hearing 10.6.16. Further mention 18.4.16 C.WEKESA DR 17.3.16 18.4.16

page 6 of 27

Before Hon.Wekesa-DR Court clerk-Muriu Accused-present Hearing 10.6.16. Further mention 18.5.16 C.WEKESA DR 18.4.16 18.5.16 Before Hon.Mutua-DR Court clerk-Wangechi State counselAccused-present Hearing on 10.6.16 P.MUTUA DR 10.6.16 Before Hon.J.Ngaah-Judge Court-Rahab Accused-present Chebet for the state Ms.Mwangi for Kiminda for the accused Chebet- I was not ready to proceed with it. Ms.Mwangi- Mr.Kiminda was not ready to proceed. CourtThe matter was scheduled to be heard before Justice Mativo. However, he is not sitting and in any event parties are not ready to proceed. The same is adjourned to 29/6/16 for hearing before court 3. J.NGAAH JUDGE 10.6.16 29.6.16 Befiore Hon.Justice J.Mativo Miss Jebet for the state Mungai –court clerk

page 7 of 27

Accused-present Kiminda for Accused Chebet for state Chebet- Investigating officer informs me that the exhibits are not ready from the Government chemist. I ask for an adjournment. Ndirangu- Accused was arrested in 2015- we need to give them a time frame. Courta. The practice of Exhibits taking long at the Government chemist has become rampant and a serious hindrance to speedy disposal of cases. I will allow one more mention within 3 weeks to confirm the status of the exhibits and it they will not be ready, I will proceed and allocate a hearing date for the case. To me, this is a problem that should not be used to delay hearing of court cases. Mention on 20.7.16. J. MATIVO JUDGE 20.7.16 Before Hon.Justice J.Mativo Miss Jebet for the state Mungai –court clerk Accused-Absent – in custody Mrs.Mwangi holding brief for Kiminda for accused Chebet for DPP Chebet- I have not received communication on the exhibits. We can take a hearing date. Mwangi- We can take a hearing date. Courta. Hearing to proceed on 7/11/16. b. Formal mention before Deputy Registrar on 3/8/16. Production Order to issue for accused to be produced on the mention date. J. MATIVO JUDGE 3.8.16 Before Hon.Mutua-DR Court clerk-Wangechi State counselAccused-present Hearing on 7.11.16 –further mention 2.9.16. P. MUTUA

page 8 of 27

DR 3.8.16 2.9.16 Before Hon.Kariuki –DR Court clerk-Salome Accused-present Hearing 7.11.16 further mention 3.10.16 N. KARIUKI DR 3.10.16 Before Hon.Kariuki –DR Court clerk-Salome Accused-present Hearing 7.11.16. Accused remanded in custody. N. KARIUKI DR 3.10.16 7.11.16 Befiore Hon.Justice J.Mativo Miss Jebet for the state Mungai –court clerk Accused-present Kiminda for accused Chebet for state ChebetThe witness I have is the father of the accused. He seems to be changing his story. He is denying his statement. I ask for time to have a pretrial session with him. Kiminda- If there are no witnesses the state should terminate the case. CourtI note that the prosecution seems to have challenges with its witnesses who are related to the accused and the deceased. However, a decision has to be made either way since we cannot keep the case in abeyance and continue holding the accused who is in custody. I will grant limited time to the prosecution to either avail the witnesses or decide the cause of action. I will not adjourn this case again on the same reasons. I allow the adjournment for now and direct as follows: a. Witness summons to issue upon David Ndonga and Moses Mwangi Gathaya

page 9 of 27

b. Hearing on 17/1/17 c. Mention before Deputy Registrar on 21/11/16. J. MATIVO JUDGE 17.11.16 Before Hon.Nelly Kariuki-DR Court clerk-Salome State counsel-no appearance Accused-present Hearing on 17.1.17. Further mention on 21.12.16 before the Deputy Registrar. Accused remanded in custody. N. KARIUKI DR 21.12.16 Before Hon.Nelly Kariuki-DR Court clerk-Salome State counsel-no appearance Accused-absent Hearing on 17.1.17. N. KARIUKI DR 17.1.17 Before Hon.J.Ngaah –Judge Court clerk-Rahab Accused-absent No appearance for accused Chebet for the state Court-The accused had now been brought. Court- The case shall be mentioned before court three (Justice Matheka) on 23/2/2017. J. NGAAH JUDGE 17.1.17 23.2.17

page 10 of 27

Before Hon.Lady Justice T.Matheka Court clerk-Harriet State counsel-Jebet Accused-present Mr.Kimani- I hold brief for Mr.Kiminda. He is before ELC Court. He requests file be placed aside. T. MATHEKA JUDGE Court-file placed aside. T. MATHEKA JUDGE 23.2.17 Later Coram as above Accused-present Kiminda for accused present KimindaWe had a problem because the prosecution had indicated that witnesses had recanted their statements. The prosecution was to consult with Mr.Kaigai. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Ms.Jebet-I pray for witness summons for :1. David Ndonga 2. Moses Mwangi Gathoka 3. Jared Muturi Ngaruka 4. John Maina Githitho T.MATHEKA JUDGE Order-Witness summons to issue for these witnesses. T.MATHEKA JUDGE The others are:1. Dr.Gachimi 2. Sgt.Mugo

page 11 of 27

3. PC Alex Wambua 4. C.I William Adenyo 5. Dr.R.Mwenda T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court-Hearing on 26/4/2017 (4 witnesses) and 17/5/2017 (5 witnesses) T. MATHEKA JUDGE 23.2.17 26.4.17 Before Hon.Lady Justice T.Matheka Court clerk-Harriet State counsel-Jebet Accused-present Kiminda for accused Ms.Jebet for the state:I am not ready to proceed. The Investigating Officer tells me that the exhibits are still at the government chemist. The exhibit was taken to the Government analyst. T. MATHEKA JUDGE Court: -Questions 1. Can I see an exhibit memo to confirm that the exhibits were taken to the government analyst? T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court prosecutor- We do not have the same here. I request for file to be placed aside. T. MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.Kiminda- I request for 11:00am to come and proceed. T. MATHEKA JUDGE Court- Hearing at 11:00am T.MATHEKA JUDGE

page 12 of 27

Later Coram: As above Court prosecutorThe Investigating Officer has rushed to Othaya to get the exhibit memo. The Investigating officer also told me he went to bond the witnesses they refused to take the summons. I pray for warrant of arrest against the witnesses. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court- There is no proof that the witnesses were served. A Warrant of Arrest cannot just issue. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.KimindaWitnesses have never attended. That was the reason why Justice Mativo gave limited time. Now that today there are no witnesses, I pray that prosecution have no evidence to tender against the accused person. That is why all this is happening. They should close their case. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Ms.JebetWe still have a hearing date of 17/5/2017. We pray that this court to indulge us today and allow us to proceed on 17/5/2017 26.4.17 Before Hon.Lady Justice T. Matheka Court Assistant-Harriet State counsel- Chebet Accused –present Kiminda for accused Ms.Jebet for the stateI am not ready to proceed. The Investigating Officer tells me that the exhibits are still at the Government chemist. The exhibit was taken to the government analyst. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court-questions 1. Can is see an exhibit memo to confirm that the exhibits were taken to the government analyst? T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court prosecutor- We do not have the same here- I request for file to be placed aside. T.MATHEKA

page 13 of 27

JUDGE Mr.Kiminda- I request for 11:00am to come and proceed. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court-Hearing at 11:00am T.MATHEKA JUDGE Later Coram: As Above Court prosecutorThe Investigating Officer has rushed to Othaya to get the exhibit memo. The Investigating Officer also told me he went to the witnesses refused to take the summons. I pray for warrant of arrest against the witnesses. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court- There is no proof that the witnesses were served. A warrant of arrest cannot just issue. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.KimindaWitnesses have never attended. That was the reason why Justice Mativo gave limited time. Now that today there are no witnesses, I pray that prosecution have no evidence to tender against the accused person. That is why all this is happening. They should close their case. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Ms.JebetWe still have a hearing date of 17/5/2017. We pray that this court to indulge us today and allow us to proceed on 17/5/2017. CourtWith regard to the next hearing date, which is already on record, the prosecution are correct – so the matter will remain with the hearing date of 17/5/2017. However with regard to today’s submission about exhibits, the matter will be mention at 2:00pm for the same to be availed by the Investigating officer. The accused and counsel’s presence will not be necessary. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Later Investigating Officer now present Court prosecutor- I have the exhibit memo dated 18/01/2015.

page 14 of 27

T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court- Exhibit memo seen. Samples were taken on 18/8/16 and 19/8/2016. T.MATHEKA JUDGE OrderSummons Requiring Attendance to Government Analyst to appear on 17/5/2017 and explain why the report is not ready. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 26.4.17 Later Further order- witness summons to issue to the four civilian witnesses who were to appear today for 17/5/2017. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 26.4.17 17.5.17 Before Hon. J. Ngaah –Judge Court clerk-Rahab Accused-present Jebet for the state Kiminda for the accused Court- Hearing on 11.10.17 mention on 28/6/2017 before the Deputy Registrar. J.NGAAH JUDGE 17.5.17 28.6.17 Before Hon.N.Kariuki –DR Court clerk-Salome State counsel-No appearance Accused-present Further mention 28.7.17. Hearing on 11.10.17. N.KARIUKI

page 15 of 27

DR 28.6.17 28.7.17 Before Hon.C.Mburu–DR Court clerk-Salome State counsel-Beatrice Accused-present Further mention on 28.8.17. hearing on 11.10.17 C.MBURU DR 28.7.17 28.8.17 Before Hon.C.Mburu–DR Court clerk-Salome State counsel-Jebet Accused-present Further mention on 28.9.17. hearing on 31.10.17. Accused remanded in custody. N.KARIUKI DR 28.8.17 28.8.17 Before Hon.N.Kariuki–DR Court clerk-Salome State counsel-Jebet Accused-present Further mention on 28.9.17. hearing on 11.10.17. Original date to remain. N.KARIUKI DR 29.8.17 28.9.17 Before Hon.R.Kefa Court Assistant-Salome

page 16 of 27

State counselAccused-present Hearing on 11.10.17 R.KEFA DR 28.9.17 12.10.17 Before Hon. Lady Justice T.Matheka State counsel-Jebet Court Assistant-Harriet Accused-present Ms.Maina holding brief for Mr.Kiminda File placed aside. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Later – Kiminda for accused person Matter was for 11.10.17. T. MATHEKA JUDGE Hearing on 17/1/18 & 1/2/18 – order of witnesses as per order of 23/2/17. Summons requiring attendance to issue accordingly. Mention 13/11/17. Remanded in custody. T. MATHEKA JUDGE 12.10.17 17.1.18 Before Hon.T.Matheka –Judge State counsel-Mr.Gitonga Court Assistant-Harriet Accused-present Kiminda for accused person present GitongaWe are not ready. This file was taken to the DPP’s office- my senior Mr.Kaigai had called for the file- the Investigating Officers are before the court. They have given me the same information. They had some predicaments with the witnesses. I need time to follow up with

page 17 of 27

Mr.Kaigai. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court to prosecution Q-Do you have any indication as to when this file was called for? A-No, I have just received this information. I will follow up with the office. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.KimindaAlthough this matter has another date, I am opposed to the application. The issue of witnesses not being available was raised on 7/11/16 before Justice Mativo. Your ladyship, when this issue was raised the state was given a limited time to decide on the way forward. When the next appeared in court on 17/1/12017 the state counsel madam Jebet sought for witness summons they were issued. From then, we have appeared before your ladyship. For one reason or the other, the witnesses have never appeared. On 26/4/17 the court was told that witnesses had refused to take summons, and exhibits were said to be with government analyst. Mr. Gitonga is seeking an adjournment for same reasons. This matter must come to an end. We have always availed ourselves to proceed. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.GitongaAs rightly put by my senior, this matter was before Hon. Mativo J and my colleague prayed for witness summons- the record will show that I have never appeared in this matter. As my senior has stated that there was an issue with witnesses from the Investigating officer. I was not aware, I pray for court’s indulgence, I do not know what could have transpired. I will confer with my senior. This is the 1 st time I am appearing. T.MATHEKA JUDGE CourtThese dates were taken in October 2017. The prosecution to avail an update on the file tomorrow 18/1/18. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 17.1.18 18.1.18 Before Hon.T.Matheka –Judge State counsel-Mr.Muranga Court Assistant-Harriet Accused-present Ms.Ndegwa for Kiminda for accused

page 18 of 27

MurangaWe had a discussion with Mr.Kaigai. He requested that the DPP be given time to forward the file for directions. He needs 2 months. We found that the file had been misplaced. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Ms.Ndegwa- The matter has hearing date -1/2/18. I am seeking for directions. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court-The matter will come to court on 1/2/18. Let the DPP Nyeri give the court the position of the matter. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 18.1.18 1.2.18 Before Hon.T.Matheka –Judge State counsel-Mr.Muranga Court Assistant-Harriet Accused-present Ms.Mwangi holding brief for Kiminda for accused. It is for hearing. However, the last time we were in court, prosecution were to inform the court if they had directions from their in charge. T.MATHEKA JUDGE MurangaI have looked at this matter. My humble review is that we shall be able to proceed with the witnesses who are available. However at a later stage we will be seeking orders to have some of the unwilling witnesses compelled to appear. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court- The state needs to respond to all the issues. Muranga-I will follow up on the exhibits. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Question-How many witnesses do you expect to call in total? Murang’a - 7 witnesses the willing witnesses -4. The unwilling are three- I need witness summons for them. T.MATHEKA

page 19 of 27

JUDGE (4) Hearing on 25/4/2018 (4witnesses) 7/6/18 (3witnesses) Witness summons to issue to Doctor, the government analyst. Mention 1/3/18 before DR Mention on 15/5/18 for prosecution to seek any orders they may need with regard to alleged reluctant witnesses. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 1.3.18 Before Hon.Irene M-DR Court AssistantState counselAccusedHearing on 25.4.18, Mention 15.5.18, Hearing 7.6.18 Further mention 4.4.18 (DR) I.MUTHEE DR 1.3.18 4.4.18 Before Hon.Irene M-DR Court Assistant-Salome State counselAccused-Present Hearing on 25.4.18 I.MUTHEE DR 4.4.18 18.4.18 Before Hon.Mumbua T.Matheka –Judge Court Assistant-Atelu State counsel-Njue Ms.Mwangi holding brief for Kiminda for accused.

page 20 of 27

Hearing on 29/5/18 witness summons for Doctors and government analyst. On 7/6/18- (3 witnesses). Mention 18/5/18 before DR. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 18.4.18 18.5.18 Before Hon.N.Kariuki-DR State counselCourt Assistant-Mercy Accused-present Hearing 29.5.18 N. KARIUKI DR 18.5.18 29.5.18 Before Hon.Mumbua T.Matheka –Judge Court Assistant-Atelu Interpretation-English/Kiswahili State counsel-Magoma Counsel for accused person- Ms.Mwangi holding for Kiminda Accused person-present Mr.Kiminda is ready State counsel- The witness summons were not issued. Court- The witness summons for government analyst are on record collected by Mr.Njue. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.MagomaI believe that the government analyst was served but he is not here. I also pray for witness summons for the civilian witnesses who are difficult to avail as they are close relatives to the accused. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.MagomaI am taking over the matter personally. I will ensure that there are witnesses on 7/6/18. I pray for witness summons for the civilian

page 21 of 27

witnesses – they come from Othaya:1. David Ndonga 2. Moses Mwangi Gathoka 3. Jared Muturi Ngaruka 4. John Maina Gatitu T.MATHEKA JUDGE I also pray for witness summons for Dr.Gachemi, Sgt Mugo from Nyeri police station (why ?) State counsel- (we can dispense with that) Ms.Mwangi- They can be granted the last adjournment. Court- Witness summons to issue for the witnesses for 7/6/18. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 29.5.18 Accused- I pray for bond. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Ms.Mwangi- On 20/1/16 bond was denied by the court on the basis that witnesses are family members. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 7.6.18 Before Hon.Mumbua T.Matheka –Judge Court Assistant-Atelu Accused-present State counsel- Magoma Kiminda for accused State counsel- I expect witnesses. Hearing at 10:00am. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Later Coram as above

page 22 of 27

Accused present Magoma for state Kiminda for accused Magoma- I had 2 witnesses. Jared Muturi is father to accused. Moses Mwangi is father to accused. Both are brothers to deceased person. They have vehemently refused to come and testify. They were present in court. They then disappeared. I pray for summons for these 2 crucial witnesses to compel their attendance. I pray for adjournment. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Summons were issued for four witnesses- the other 2 have not been accounted for. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court prosecutorThe other 2 were not found at home. I pray for warrant of arrest for the 2 witnesses who were present in court. I pray for warrant of arrest. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court- Where is the evidence that they were served? T.MATHEKA JUDGE State counselThey were served. That is why they came today. They would not have known the matter was for hearing today if they had not been served. T.MATHEKA JUDGE CourtThe prosecutor is not serious. The witnesses are relatives of the accused. They could have learnt of the hearing date from the accused. Prosecution needs to provide court with proof of service/Return of service/affidavit but cannot say from the Bar that witnesses were served and expect warrant of arrest to issue. T.MATHEKA JUDGE KimindaWe are opposed to the application for any application for adjournment. Plea was taken on 11/2/15. I can confirm that we have come to court on not less than 10 occasions for hearing. Not a single witness has ever come to court to testify. On 17/11/16 the state had indicated to the court that they were having challenges with witnesses who had recanted their evidence – Judge gave them limited time to avail witnesses/decide way forward. On 23.2.17 witness summons were applied for and issued for all these witnesses. We have appeared severally – state has even sought to seek directions on the way forward from head office. On 29/5/18 we were before you. Matter had 2 hearing dates. It was adjourned to today. No single witness in court. Some witnesses are still being said not to be cooperative. 3 years down the line, witnesses not available not ready,accused is entitled to his right to expeditious

page 23 of 27

disposal of the matter. Application for adjournment be refused. State has had sufficient time. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.MagomaIt is very clear that we had witnesses today. They were served they are not in court. Because of their mutual relationship with deceased. No witnesses disappeared, we pray for another hearing date for witness summons be served afresh. If they fail not to come action be taken against them. T.MATHEKA JUDGE CourtThis case- the prosecution is not serious. Not a single witness has appeared since 2015. The file is full of witness summons and no evidence of service on any of them. The prosecution will have a LAST ADJOURNMENT to avail all its remaining witnesses during the next hearing dates. Should they have challenges- since the date is far off, they are at liberty to have the file brought up before me before the hearing date for any other directions. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Court prosecutor- I will be calling 6 witnesses. -4 civilians -1 police officer -2 doctors -we are not calling the government analyst. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Hearing on 31/10/2018 (3) 1/11/2018 (4) Court prosecutor- I need witness summons for:Jared Muturi Ngaruka Moses Mwangi Gathoga David Waweru John Maina Gathitu Gr.Gachimi Dr.Mwende T.MATHEKA JUDGE

page 24 of 27

7.6.18 Mention before the Deputy Registrar on the 6/7/18. T.MATHEKA JUDGE 6.7.2018 Before Hon.N.Kariuki –DR Court assistant-Mercy State counsel-Kitoto Accused-present Further mention 6.8.18. Hearing on 31.10.18 and 1.11.18 N.KARIUKI DR 6.7.18 6.8.18 Before Hon.R.Kefa –DR Court assistant-Makena State counselAccused-present Further mention 5.9.18. Hearing on 31.10.18 and 1.11.18 R.KEFA DR 6.8.18 5.9.18 Before Hon.N.Kariuki –DR Court assistant-Mercy State counsel-absent Accused-present Further mention 5.10.18. Hearing on 31.10.18 and 1.11.18 N.KARIUKI DR 5.9.18 5.10.18

page 25 of 27

Before Hon.R.Kefa –DR Court assistant-Makena State counselAccused-present Hearing on 31.10.18 and 1.11.18 R.KEFA DR 5.10.18 30.10.18 Before Hon.Mumbua T.Matheka –Judge Court Assistant-Atelu Kiminda for accused Accused present Magoma for state Magoma- I request file be placed aside to 11:00am. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Later Coram As Above Accused-present Kiminda for accused MagomaIt was called for in the morning. I requested that file be placed aside. We have challenges – we took date on 7/6/18. The Investigating officer Mr.Alex Wambua was present. I applied for summons for witnesses- whom I said were relatives of accused. I called Alex on Monday last week. He told me that he has served witness summons and they were willing to come. I rang him this morning. The phone was going through but he was not picking my phone. He has sent another officer with the file. The date he was indicated on the file is different from the date we took in court – i.e. 26/10/18 – yet he was present when we took the date. I rang him on 22/10/18 and he said he knew matter was for today and witnesses had been bonded. I am not pre-empting what transpired. I believe that matter had last adjournment. Alex personally took those summons. I can confirm that there are no witness summons on the police file. I do feel on my part this is frustration from part of the police. Matter was given last adjournment. I leave it to the court. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Mr.KimindaWe oppose any application for adjournment. The issue for challenge of witnesses arose in November 2016. The Judge gave the state time to consider what would be done on regards these witnesses.

page 26 of 27

On several occasions not a single witness has even attended court- only the investigating officer attends. On 7/6/18 this court was constrained to indicate that no more adjournment would be granted. The state itself is admitting it has challenges. Accused has been in remand since 18/1/15. The bond was declined for the reason that witnesses were related to accused person. For the last 3 years, state has said it has challenges, adjournment be refused and the accused should be set free. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Magoma- I close my case. T.MATHEKA JUDGE Ruling on 22/11/18. T.MATHEKA JUDGE RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT NYERI IN OPEN COURT THIS 22ND NOVEMBER 2018. MUMBUA T. MATHEKA JUDGE In the presence of:Court Assistant-Kinyua Magoma for state Accused person Ms.Mwangi holding brief for Mr.Kiminda T.MATHEKA JUDGE

page 27 of 27

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.