Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 1994 of 2018

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 185 OF 2009 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF M’ICHABA M’ARUNGA (DECEASED) BENEDICT PIUS MARANGU M’ARUNGA .........................................PETITIONER -VSJAMES P. RIUNGU.........................................................................................OBJECTOR FINAL JUDGMENT 1. On 28th June, 2018, this court delivered a partial judgment wherein it directed the administrator do file and serve within 30 days a detailed affidavit specifying all the children of the deceased those alive and those deceased; specify who the grand-children are and to whom they belonged; get the concurrence in writing of those daughters of the deceased who had not signed the consent to the proposed distribution or their renunciation in writing. He was also to specify how the beneficiaries occupied the estate land on the ground. 2. The matter came up for mention to confirm compliance on 18 th June, 2018 and 15th October, 2018. However, on both occasions, the court found that the directions had not been complied with. On the said 15 th October, 2018, the court gave the petitioner 14 days to comply, but as at the time of writing this final judgment, nothing had been filed. 3. This being a very old matter, it cannot be left to the parties or any one of them to dictate how and when it is to be determined. In this regard, the court has decided to make a determination based on the material on record. In its partial judgment, the court held that the estate will be distributed equally to all the children of the deceased in terms of section 40 of the Law of Succession Act (“the Act”). The shares of those children of the deceased beneficiaries will go to their respective children in terms of section 41 of the Act. 4. There are 3 properties. The court does not know how the parties have occupied the same on the ground. The parties were given the opportunity to inform the court, to avoid the many frivolous applications for rectification that are abound in Succession matters after confirmation, but they failed to do so. In this regard, the estate will be distributed as follows: a) L. R No. Mitunguu/Kithino/600 b) L. R No. Mitunguu/Kithino/601 c) L. R. No. Nkuene/Nkumari/529 i) Benedict Pius Marangu ii) David Pius Mugambi iii) Jacob Mputhia Pius iv) James Pius Riungu v) Kanana Njogu Silas Elity Makena Njogu

page 1 of 2

Jackline Karwitha Njogu vi) Mutugi M’Mwobobia vii) Rose Gaki Kamunde viii) Priscilla Njeri Muthuri ix) Gantuku Mburugu x) Lucy Kabugi Mburugu xi) Anjelina Mpinda Gauku xii) Christine Nkirote Kimaita xiii) Caroline Ngugi Mwawasia xiv) Agnes Gauku Pius xv) Mugito Pius xvi) Kagwiria Pius xvii) Karambu Pius Equally d) During distribution, the administrators should endevour to ensure that each beneficiary is allocated the area or place or position that he was in occupation at the time of the demise of the deceased. e) The grant of letters of administration issued to Benedict Pius Marangu M’Arunga and James Pius Riungu is hereby confirmed. f) Distribution be effected within 6 months from the date of this final judgment. g) This being a family matter, I make no order as to costs. DATED and DELIVERED at Meru this 29th day of November, 2018. A. MABEYA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.