Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Maurice Otieno Opetu v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA SIAYA HC. MISC. CR. APP. NO. 42 OF 2016 (CORAM: R. E. ABURILI - J.) MAURICE OTIENO OPETU..................APPLICANT/APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC......................................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant is absent. The conviction and sentence was meted out in May 2016 and in my view, albeit the sentences were to run consecutively, the convict must have completed his said sentences, by now as it is over 2years since he was sentenced. 2. The Application for Revision of Sentence was made on 6/5/2016 and no follow up was made. 3. The same is dismissed and file herein is closed. Orders accordingly. Dated, Signed and Delivered at SIAYA this 6th Day of November 2018. R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.