Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Muange Musyoki v East West Veg. Limited & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 364 OF 2005 JAMES MUANGE MUSYOKI......................................APPELLANT VERSUS EAST WEST VEG. LIMITED.............................1ST RESPONDENT CHARLES KIMOTHO........................................2ND RESPONDENT (Being an Appeal from the Ruling of the Hon. P. Gichohi (Mrs) in objecting proceedings in Civil Case No. 768 of 2004 in the Chief Magistrate’s Court in Nairobi given on the 17th of May 2005) RULING There is an application on record dated 18 th October, 2016 seeking an order that the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution on 24 th March, 2015 be set aside and the appeal be reinstated. The application is opposed and there is a replying affidavit sworn by counsel for the respondent and also a Notice of Preliminary Objection challenging the capacity of the appellant’s advocate because it is said, he had no authority to file the application. It is observed there is no Notice of Change filed as required under Order 9 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules. I have considered the rival affidavits and the submissions filed herein. I have related the said submissions to the substratum of the main suit leading to the present appeal. My first observation is that notwithstanding the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules, I cannot strike out the appeal just because counsel has not filed a Notice of Change of Advocate. This is a step that can be regularised, and in any case that is a technicality that has been outlawed by the Constitution. Further, no prejudice may be occasioned to the respondents by that omission. Counsel for the appellant has explained the reasons for his absence on the date the appeal was dismissed and although the reasons may appear flimsy, I am persuaded such an omission should not be visited upon the appellant. I am prepared to reluctantly set aside the dismissal order, on condition that the appellant pays all the costs occasioned to the respondents this far which costs shall be agreed and if not, be subjected to taxation. Further, the appellant shall prosecute the appeal within 120 days from the date of this ruling. In default of the above conditions the appeal shall stand dismissed without any reference to the court. Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 19th day of December, 2018. A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.