REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET P&A NO. 350 OF 2015 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF SAWE MAINA (DECEASED) SUSAN JEPTEPKENY MAINA................................1ST APPLICANT JAEL JEMASUNDE MAINA...................................2ND APPLICANT -VERSUSGILBERT KIPLIMO MAINA..............................1ST RESPONDENT REBECCA JEMELI SINGOEI.............................2ND RESPONDENT RULING [1] There is a pending application herein dated 8th March 2018. That application was filed pursuant to Sections 45 and 47 of the Law of Succession Act, Chapter 160 of the Laws of Kenya for orders, inter alia, that the Administrator herein Elizabeth Maina, who is now deceased be substituted by the two Applicants, Susan Jeptepkeny Maina and Jael Jemasunde Maina. When the matter came up for hearing on 23rd July, 2018, Counsel for the parties intimated to the court the willingness of the parties to have the matter settled amicably; for which time was needed. [2] In the interim, Dr. Chebii, Learned Counsel for the Applicant asked that prayers 3 and 4 of the subject application be granted pending settlement and/or disposal of the application. That request was strongly opposed by Counsel for the two Respondents, Mr. Sambu and Mr. Korir, whose contention was that the conditions for the grant of the orders sought have not been met. Their argument was that to issue the orders sought would exacerbate the situation on the ground and create needless conflict between the parties. [3] I have looked at the prayers sought and note that Prayer 3 seeks orders that the Respondents, Gilbert Kiplimo Maina and Rebecca Jemeli Singoei, be restrained from intermeddling with the estate comprising of 224 acres of land; while Prayer 4 seeks an order commanding the beneficiaries to make use of all the arable part of the land equally, namely 13 acres each for farming and grazing. It is manifest therefore that the orders sought as drastic in nature and are the sort that can only be made after hearing each of the parties. [4] Secondly, the orders sought, as crafted seem to involve the entire estate, when it is apparent that the deceased had in his lifetime distributed the estate equally as between the two houses; a fact that was conceded by Dr. Chebii. Hence it is evident that granting the orders sought would invariably impact on the half share that has already been given to the 1 st house; over which there is no controversy. Besides, I would agree that the interests of justice would best be served by maintaining the present status quo pending hearing, if the matter can be fasttracked. [5] Accordingly, I would decline Dr. Chebii’s request but direct that the matte be mentioned before the Deputy Registrar for the purpose of fixing of a hearing date on priority basis before any other Judge in the station. Orders accordingly. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY 2018 OLGA SEWE JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.