REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI HIGH COURT MISC. CAUSE NO. 298 OF 2015 KTK ADVOCATES……………………..……....……ADVOCATE/APPLICANT VERSUS NYAMBENE COFFEE ESTATES LTD………...…1ST CLIENT/RESPONDENT NYAMBENE MILLS LTD…...………………....…2ND CLIENT/RESPONDENT LAWRENCE C.NJERU…………………………..3RDCLIENT/RESPONDENT RULING 1. Counsel Kipkorir appeared before me on 8th June, 2017 in the absence of Counsel for the Clients. I allowed the matter to proceed as the hearing date had been taken by consent on 26th April, 2017. 2. It now turns out however that Counsel Kipkorir prosecuted the Application dated 20th July, 2016 which had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 30 the November, 2016. Although there is an application dated 23rd January 2017 to set aside the dismissal Order and to reinstate the dismissed Application, the latter Motion has not been prosecuted. 3. I am afraid the Notice of Motion dated 23rd January 2017 needs to be heard first. Dated, Signed and Delivered in Court at Nairobi this 22ND day of September,2017. F. TUIYOTT JUDGE PRESENT; Omollo for Applicant Malowa for Respondent Alex - Court Clerk
Original judgment
Ktk Advocates v Nyambene Coffee Estates Ltd & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.