Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jackline Atieno Ongoro & 1 other v Orange Democratic Movement (odm) & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL REVIEW DIVISION ELECTION PETITION APPEAL NO.97 OF 2017 JACKLINE ATIENO ONGORO...............................................APPELLANT VERSUS ORANGE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT (ODM)........1ST RESPONDENT BASSIL OTIENO ODERO..............................................2NDRESPONDENT JUDGMENT It was clear to this court that the tribunal (Political Parties Dispute Tribunal) erred when, upon setting aside its judgment of 13 th May 2017, it proceeded to grant orders in favour of the 2 nd Respondent without hearing the merits of the complaint lodged by the Appellant in her initial complaint. The 2nd Respondent’s application seeking to review the judgment of the tribunal was predicated upon his contention that he had not been served, and that the earlier judgment issued by the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal was issued without his knowledge. The Political Parties Dispute Tribunal upheld the 2 nd Respondent’s assertion that he was not served. This court having read the passage of the Ruling of the tribunal agrees with the finding in that regard. However, this court notes that the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal proceeded to grant orders in favour of the 2nd Respondent without the benefit of hearing both parties in accordance with the merits or otherwise of their respective cases. The Appellant has a case when she says that she was condemned unheard by the tribunal. This court sees no basis upon which the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal issued the orders in favour of the 2 nd Respondent after setting aside its judgment. In the premises therefore, the Appellant partially succeeds in her appeal as a result of which the orders made in Paragraph 21 of the Ruling dated 8th June 2017 is set aside and substituted by an order of this court requiring the tribunal to hear the complaint lodged by the Appellant on its merits. The parties shall appear before the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal on 15th June 2017 at 9.00 a.m. for directions regarding the hearing, on merits, of the complaint that was lodged by the Appellant. The Political Parties Dispute Tribunal is directed to render its decision as soon as possible in any event not later than 4.00 p.m. on 16th June 2017. There shall be no orders as to costs. DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2017 L. KIMARU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.