REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARISSA CRIMINAL CASE NO. 15 OF 2013 REPUBLIC ………….....................................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS 1. ABDI ALIO MAHAMAD HASSAN 2. ABDIRIZAK MOHAMED ABDI.......................................ACCUSEDS 3. MOHAMED RASHID SHAABAN RULING At the close of the prosecution case the defence counsel Mr. Ingutya stated that he will not make any submissions on case to answer. The prosecuting counsel Mr. Okemwa stated that the evidence on record linked the accused persons to the death of the deceased and that the prosecution had established a prima facie case requiring the accused to be put on their defences. Having considered the evidence on record, I am of the view that each of the three accused persons has a case to answer. I thus put each of the accused persons on their defences and will proceed to explain to them the three options available to them in their defences in terms of section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code Cap 75. Dated and delivered at Garissa this 13th day of January, 2017 GEORGE DULU JUDGE
Original judgment
Republic v 1. Abdi Alio Mahamad Hassan 2. Abdirizak Mohamed Abdi & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.