REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO. 1957 OF 2015 LUCY WAMBUI WANJIRU ……………………..........1ST CLAIMANT RAPHAEL MOKURA UMARI .……………….......…. 2ND CLAIMANT ROBIN OBINO …………………….……….......…….3RD CLAIMANT WILSON R. NDUNGU ……………..……….......….....4TH CLAIMANT LEAZE AWUDA ASHERI …….….……………......….5TH CLAIMANT LILIAN MWENDE KYUMWA ….…...…………......….6TH CLAIMANT BRIAN IRUNGU MUREITHI ….....……………….........7TH CLAIMANT JAMES KIARIE MUNGAI ………...…………......……8TH CLAIMANT FLORA WAIRIMU KAMAU ……......…………......…..9TH CLAIMANT EDGAR NYANGONG …………......…………......…..10TH CLAIMANT CHARLES LIBUSI KIMAKWA …....……….....…….11TH CLAIMANT CHRISTINE WAMBUI GIICHUKI ….......….....……..12TH CLAIMANT BERYL A. ONUNDA ………………....………......…13TH CLAIMANT VERSUS GLOBAL VILLAGE PUBLISHERS (E.A) LIMITED….RESPONDENT Mr. George Mwangi for claimant/applicant Mr. Paul Mwangi for respondent RULING
page 1 of 3
1. Applicants seek an order directing the respondent to release withheld salary arrears to the 13 claimants, which amount is stated on the face of the Notice of Motion. 2. The application is based on Section 1A, 1B, 3A & 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act. 3. The respondent, filed grounds of objection to wit: 1. That the application does not lie in law and is incompetent. 2. That the application is legally vague and impossible to defend. 3. That the application is based on inadmissible: without prejudice” communication. 4. That the claimants have constructively terminated their employment without notice and owe the employer one month’s salary in lieu of notice. 5. That the respondent has not admitted any part of the claim and has a good defence. 6. That the amount claimed of Kshs.1,298,075.00 forms part of the main suit, and is disputed on sound legal grounds. 7. That there is no power to grant the order sought on the basis of the application. 8. That the entire application is an abuse of the court process and replying affidavit sworn on 12 th April 2016. 4. Both parties filed written submissions Determination 5. I have looked at the provisions of Sections 1A, 1B, 3A & 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act. 6. Section 1A is on the overriding objective of the Act, 1B is on duty of the court, 3A is on saving of inherent power of the court to take such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice whereas 63(e) provides for making of interlocutory orders. 7. These provisions are wrongly relied upon in an application seeking summary judgment on admission. Triable issues are disclosed in this matter including the determination of the nature of employment of the claimants, whether or not the claimants’ employment was terminated by the respondent and whether the claimants are owed terminal benefits and if so the quantum thereof. 8. Granted that respondent pleaded as follows; “further and contrary to what has been averred by the claimants, the respondent through one of its directors, Mr. Wellington Kwendo Opanga asked employees to proceed on paid annual leave pending the payment of money in salary arrears owed and commissions unpaid since June 2015”, it would appear that there is an admission that the respondent had not paid the claimants monthly salary and commissions but the specific amounts due are unknown. 9. However this is not an application under Order 13 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Act, under which the court may consider entering judgment on admissions upon application. 10. The court agrees with the respondent that this application does not lie in law, it is legally vague and embarrassing and the same is therefore incompetent. For the avoidance of doubt, the Civil Procedure Act is applicable in all civil proceedings including the matter before this court where the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and the Rules of this court are silent. 11. The application is dismissed and the main suit be heard on the merits.
page 2 of 3
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 3rd day of February 2017 MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA PRINCIPAL JUDGE
page 3 of 3