Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Baini Nkari & 2 others v Ndereva Naichu & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT CHUKA CHUKA ELC CASE NO 74 OF 2017 FORMERLY MERU PETITION CASE NO. 09 OF 2013 BAINI NKARI……………………………………………….…..1ST PETITIONER KANGA MWIREBUA…………………………………...…..….2ND PETITIONER MBIUKI MWIRABUA………………………………….…….....3RD PETITIONER VERSUS NDEREVA NAICHU………………………..……..……..….........1ST RESPONDENT DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION & SETTLEMENT MERU SOUTH DISTRICT…….……...………………2ND RESPONDENT DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION AND SETTLEMENT…...…….….3 RD RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL………………..…………….....….…...........4TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. When the parties were to come to court on 22.2.2017 to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17 rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, they did not turn up. 2. I am satisfied that the apposite notice was properly issued. 3. I find that the parties have failed to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17 rule 2 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The suit, therefore, merits dismissal. 4. The suit is dismissed. 5. It is so ordered. Delivered in open court at Chuka this 22nd day of February, 2017 in the presence of:

page 1 of 2

CA: Ndegwa Parties absent P.M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.