Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 7576 of 2017

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 61 OF 2015 BETWEEN NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA LIMITED …………………..... CLIENT /APPLICANT AND OTIENO RAGOT & COMPANY ADVOCATES ……... ADVOCATES/ RESPONDENT RULING NO. 3 1. The application before the court is one for review of the ruling dated 17 th August 2016 (Ruling No. 2) in which I dismissed the Client’s reference dated 14 th December 2015 and allowed the Advocates’ reference dated 30th December 2015. 2. The parties agreed a similar application for review had been filed in Kisumu HC Misc. 61 of 2015 and the ruling in that case should apply to this matter as the grounds and arguments were similar. 3. In accordance with Ruling No. 3 in Kisumu HC Misc. 61 of 2015, I review the orders made on 17th August 2015 and set aside the decision. The references shall now be heard afresh. 4. The Client shall pay the Advocates the costs which I assess at Kshs. 30,000/-. 5. Orders accordingly. DATED and DELIVERED at KISUMU this 6th day of March 2017. D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE Mr Ojuro instructed by Otieno, Yogo, Ojuro & Company Advocates for the Client/applicant. Mr Otieno instructed by Otieno Ragot & Company Advocates for the Advocates/respondents.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.