Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

South Nyanza Sugar Company Limited v Walter Guya

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MIGORI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2015 BETWEEN SOUTH NYANZA SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED …........ APPELLANT AND WALTER GUYA ………….......................…………….….RESPONDENT (An appeal from the judgment of Hon. P.Y. Kulecho, RM, in Migori CMCC No.511 of 2014 dated 30/04/2015) JUDGMENT 1. SOUTH NYANZA SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED (the appellant) is dissatisfied with the decision where the trial court entered judgment in favour of WALTER GUYA (the appellant) in the sum of Kshs.666,145/= plus costs and interest arising out of claims for compensation based on loss suffered when the appellant failed to harvest mature sugar cane planted by the respondent on a piece of land measuring 4.3 Hectares. 2. He claimed to have had a yield of 100 tons per acre which was worth Kshs.2500/= per ton. The trial magistrate wholly relied on these figures in working out what was due to the respondent. 3. The appellant challenged the decision on grounds that the trial magistrate had disregarded the expect witnesses evidence on the expected tonnage, hence arriving at erroneous award of tonnage. 4. The trial magistrate was also faulted for using evaluation of the evidence and making findings for what the respondent had not prayed for. 5. The court directed that the appeal be canvassed by way of written submissions but by the date for confirmation only the respondent had filed written submissions. 6. The respondent’s counsel pointed out that the appeal was res judicata as there exists Migori HCCA No.88 of 2015 in respect of the same matter which was heard and determined. He referred the court to the judgment dated 21/07/2015 by Majanja, J which allowed the appeal in part. 7. Indeed a reading the judgment referred to discloses that it relates to the same subject as the present appeal including the grounds thereto. I am in agreement with the respondent’s counsel that this appeal is res judicata and the same is dismissed with costs to the respondent. Written and dated this 21st day of February, 2017 at Homa Bay H.A. OMONDI JUDGE Delivered and dated this 27th day of February, 2017 at Migori

page 1 of 2

A.C. MRIMA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.