Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Linet Kwatucha Weku v Cornelius W. Wamalwa & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 210 OF 2015 LINET KWATUCHA WEKU ………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS CORNELIUS W. WAMALWA ………… 1 ST RESPONDENT CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI………...… 2ND RESPONDENT RULING This is an application by way of Notice of Motion under Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of Civil Procedure Act and Order 42 Rule 6 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking a stay of execution of the order of the lower court dated 30th April, 2015 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. The dispute in the lower court related to occupation and ownership of a house No. HFO – 10 Huruma Estate Nairobi owned by the 2nd respondent. Both the appellant and the 1st respondent claim equal rights to the said house. The lower court made an order that the said house was allocated to the 1 st respondent. The appellant disputed that position hence this application. The application is dated 28th June, 2016 but the memorandum of appeal was filed timeously, that is on 8 th May, 2015. Both counsel have filed submissions to the application. The appellant has filed what appears to be receipts and acknowledged by the 2nd respondent that she had been paying rent and is in occupation. She has a right of appeal and there is not a serious challenge to the fact that she is in occupation of the said premises. I am inclined to allow stay of execution of the lower court order. The record of appeal however has to be filed within 30 days from the date of this ruling. Each party shall bear their own costs. Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 28th Day of March, 2017. A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.