Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v James Maina Mwangi

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A CRIMINAL CASE NO 11 OF 2016 REPUBLIC………………………………………..PROSECUTOR VERSUS JAMES MAINA MWANGI….……..….................…….ACCUSED RULING 1. The Accused in this case, James Maina Mwangi, is charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. It is alleged in the information dated 04/07/2016 that on 22/06/2016 within Gatharaini Village, Mathioya Sub-County of Murang’a County he murdered his mother Esther Mugure Mwangi. On 13/07/2016 he pleaded not guilty to the charge. His trial is scheduled to commence on 11/04/2017. In the meantime he has applied by notice of motion dated 07/09/2016 to be admitted to bail. The Republic has not opposed the application. 2.Bail pending trial for any offence is now a constitutional right that will be denied only for compelling reason. Any conditions for such bail the court might impose, again by constitutional edict, must be reasonable. See Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. 3. I have perused the witness statements and other documents supplied to the Accused and to the court by the prosecution, and I have noted the circumstances in which the alleged offence was committed. I find no compelling reason to deny the Accused bail. 4. I will in the event allow the notice of motion dated 07/09/2016. The Accused shall be admitted to bail upon his own cognizance in the sum of KShs 500,000/00 plus one surety in like sum. It is so ordered. DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2017 H P G WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2017

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.