Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v The Honourable Attorney General & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI JUDICIAL REVIEW NO. 7 OF 2016 REPUBLIC.....................................................................PLAINTIFF Versus THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL......RESPONDENT EXPARTE REUBEN MUTHEE NTEERE.........................................SUBJECT JUDGMENT 1. REUBEN MUTHEE NTEERE obtained judgment of Ksh. 120,000 plus costs of Ksh. 23,952.5 against the Attorney General on 4th April, 2012. To date that judgment has not been satisfied despite numerous requests so to do. 2. Reuben seeks for an order of Mandamus be issued to compel the Principal Secretary of the Ministry of Interior and Coordination of the Government of Kenya, to satisfy the decree so passed. The respondent although served with the application did not oppose nor appear at the hearing. 3. The court has perused the judgment in Nanyuki Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil case No. 29 of 2010, and the decree. The application is merited. This court grants the following orders: (a) An order of Mandamus shall issue to compel the Principal Secretary of the Ministry of Interior and Coordination, of the Government of Kenya, to satisfy the decree in Nanyuki Chief Magistrate Court Civil No. 29 OF 2010. (B) The applicant is awarded costs of the suit. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NANYUKI THIS 30thDAY OF MARCH 2017. MARY KASANGO JUDGE CORAM: Before Justice Mary Kasango

page 1 of 2

Court Assistant – Ndungu Appellant: reuben muthee................... For the State: …..................................... COURT Judgment delivered in open court. MARY KASANGO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.