REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA CHUKA ELC CA CASE NO 01 OF 2017 FORMERLY MERU ELC CA CASE NO.116 OF 2001 JOHN MATI NJOKA..............................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS JASPER NDEKE SHADRACK..........................................DEFENDANT RULING 1. When the parties were to come to court on 22.3.2017 to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17 rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, they did not turn up. 2. I am satisfied that the apposite notice was properly issued. 3. I find that the parties have failed to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17 rule 2 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The suit, therefore, merits dismissal. 4. The suit is dismissed. 5. It is so ordered. Delivered in open court at Chuka this 22nd day of March, 2017 in the presence of: CA: Ndegwa Parties absent P.M. NJOROGE JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.