REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA ADMIRALTY CLAIM NO. 3 OF 2017 ALI DAUD MOHAMED & SAID SHABAN DEROW....................CLAIMANT VERSUS THE MEDITERRANEON SHIPPING COMPANY & THE OWNERS OF THE MOTOR VESSEL "MSC PYLOS & MSC TG ATHENA".........DEFENDANT RULING 1. I have re-looked at this file and asked myself the fundamental question regarding jurisdiction. The admiralty jurisdiction of this court is exercisable ‘in all matters arising in the high seas or in territorial waters, as defined under the Interpretation and General Provision Act, or upon any lake or other navigable inland water in Kenya’. 2. I understand an admiralty court to exercise the authority vested in the crown and it is beyond doubt that even those powers do not go beyond our territorial boundaries. 3. Even if I was to be blind to that reality and gave orders, this court would be totally helpless to have such orders enforced. The court shall have acted in futility. That to this court is neither desirable nor necessary. 4. I find that this claim in rem discloses that the ship and it cargo therein laden being outside the jurisdiction of this court, the court lacks jurisdiction to exercise and I have no otherwise but to have the suit struck out and the orders given on 28/04/2017 to have been given in error and are thereby recalled and set aside. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 02nd day of May 2017. HON. P. J. O. OTIENO JUDGE
Original judgment
Ali Daud Mohamed & Said Shaban Derow v The Mediterraneon Shipping Company & The Owners of The Motor Vessel "msc Pylos & Msc Tg Athena"
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.