Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 5580 of 2017

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF MERU CRIMINAL REVISION NO 96 OF 2017 JAMES KAUNGA …………………………………………APPELLANT -VSREPUBLIC ……………………………………………….RESPONDENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------JUDGMENT [1] The Applicant was charged with the offence of interfering with demarcated land boundary features contrary to Section 33(d) of the Land adjudication Act CAP 284 Laws of Kenya.The case was heard and on4th May 2017, the trial Magistrate sentenced the Appellant to one year imprisonment. [2] In the committal warrant it was erroneously stated that the Applicant was charged under section 23(a) of The Land Adjudication Act CAP 284. This is just an error on the part of the person who prepared the committal warrant because the charge sheet was amended to read Section 33(d) of the Land adjudication Act CAP 284 Laws of Kenya. Nothing turns on this error. [3] I move to other potent grounds namely;(a) That the sentence is illegal for being contrary to section 33(d) of the Land adjudication Act CAP 284 Laws of Kenya; (2) The trial magistrate did not call for mitigating reports [4] The substantive as well as the penalty provision is Section 33(d)of the Land adjudication Act CAP 284 Laws of Kenyawhich states that; 33 “Any person who(d) without reasonable excuse interferes with any demarcated boundary, or defaces, removes, injures or otherwise impairs any feature of a demarcated boundary, or allows any demarcated boundary to fall into disrepair… shall be guilty of an offence and liable to a fine not exceeding three thousand shillings or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to both such fine and such imprisonment…” Accordingly, a jail term of one year is clearly illegal. I will therefore, substitute the sentence to a fine of Kshs. 3, 000 in default he shall serve three (3) months imprisonment. The sentence imposed by the trial magistrate is hereby set aside. It is so ordered. Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Meru this 31st day of May 2017. --------------------F. GIKONYO

page 1 of 2

JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.