REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2013 W. E. TILLEY MUTHAIGA LIMITED ….............................. 1ST APPELLANT/APPLICANT DOMINIC OMONDI OBUOYO …........................................2ND APPELLANT/APPLICANT VERSUS NELSON OWEN ONGAYO (SUING AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JACOB OMOIMBO OBUOYO DECEASED) ….......................RESPONDENT RULING Before me is an application by the applicant seeking to set aside or review the order of this Court dated 20th March 2017 which dismissed the applicant's appeal for reason that it had not filed its submissions. It is urged that the submissions were indeed filed on 20th March 2017 and that as this Court was dismissing the appeal the submissions were being filed in the registry. The application is opposed. I have considered the grounds for the application and those in opposition. I have also noted that this is about the third time this appeal has been dismissed. However the submissions for the appellant are now on record and it is in the interest of justice that the appeal be heard on the merits. Accordingly the application is reinstated. The appeal is allowed but with an order that the applicant/appellant shall pay thrown away costs of Kshs.10,000/= (ten thousand shillings) to the respondent. The respondent is given leave to file his submissions within thirty days of this ruling and thereafter the appeal shall be mentioned on 27th June 2017 with a view to giving a date for judgment. It is so ordered. E. N. MAINA JUDGE Ruling delivered in presence of Mr. Ouma Njoga Advocate holding brief for Mrs Obaga for the Respondent. E. N. MAINA JUDGE 25/5/2017
Original judgment
W. E. Tilley Muthaiga Limited & 1 other v Nelson Owen Ongayo (suing As The Personal Representative of The Estate of Jacob Omoimbo Obuoyo Deceased)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.