Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Julius Kiambati M’mbura v Bernard Kirimi Thirunga & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISC. CIVIL APP. NO. 22 OF 2015 JULIUS KIAMBATI M’MBURA…....................................APPLICANT VERSUS BERNARD KIRIMI THIRUNGA..……………….. 1st RESPONDENT THE LAND ADJ. SETTLMENT OFFICER, TIGANI WEST DISTRICT…………………........2ND RESPONDENT HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL………............…..3RD RESPONDENT RULING This court handled the matter for the first time on 6 th April, 2017. Present on that day was Miss Njenga holding brief for Mwanzia for Applicant, and Muthomi holding brief for Murango Mwenda for 1st Respondent. There was no appearance for 2nd and 3rd Respondent. Miss Njenga had informed the court that the matter was coming for hearing of the application of 17 th April, 2015, whereby submissions had been filed for applicant and 1st Respondent I have perused the Submissions on record whereby for Applicant, he has filed two separate set of Submissions for the application of 16:09:15 and that of 17:04:15. For the 1st Respondent Submissions are combined ( for the two applications). I am unable to discern the record of the court on whether the court is to deal with the two applications at the same time. in the circumstances, the court will give further directions on the matter after the parties avail more information on how the application were to be handled. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT MERU THIS 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2017 IN THE PRESENCE OF: CA: Janet Njenga for Applicant present Murango Mwenda for 1st Respondent Present Antony General for 3rd Respondent present HON. L. N. MBUGUA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.