REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 598 OF 2012 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF MURANG’A RESISTERED TRUSTEES...............................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ROYAL MEDIA SERVICES LTD.................................DEFENDANT RULING This matter was handled by Ombija J who on 18th February, 2016 heard an application by the defendant which sought the dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution. After recording the submissions by counsel, the judge made the following order, “The application dated 3/9/2015 is granted in terms of prayers 1 and 2 of the application. Reasons for the dismissal be given on 14/4/2016.” No such reasons are on record. The judge has retired and I am not in a position to know the reasons he would have given for the dismissal order above. To ensure that justice is done to both parties, the order that commends itself is that the parties have to appear before any other Judge in the Division for directions considering that the retired Judge had made a decision in favour of one of the parties, only that the reasons therefor were never given. As this is an old matter, priority should be considered when giving dates. No order as to costs. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 26th Day of April, 2017 A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE
Original judgment
Catholic Diocese of Murang’a Resistered Trustees v Royal Media Services Ltd
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.