REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND SUIT NO 68. OF 2014 STEPHEN MICHUKI KIUNGA.......................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS COUNTY GOVERMENT OF MERU..........................................DEFENDANT RULING Pursuant to provisions of Section 1 A & B of the Civil procedure Act, parties and their Advocates are called upon to assist the Court in achieving the overriding objective. As such parties are supposed to comply with directions given by the Court. The record of the Court shows that defence were given ample time to comply. They didn't. In particular the record of 08.12.16 is self explanatory. In the circumstances I decline to grant defence more time to comply Delivered in open Court at Meru this 21st February, 2017 in the presence of:CA: Mugai/Kananu Mwirigi Kaburu Advocate Kiome Advocate L.N. MBUGUA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.