Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Andiano Wegesa Muganda v Fredrick Wafula Wekesa Cyril Sudi Wekesa & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 553 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF ADRIANO WEKESA MUGANDA (alias) ANDIANO WEGESA MUGANDA……………….......…..DECEASED VERSUS FREDRICK WAFULA WEKESA CYRIL SUDI WEKESA………………….………….…PETITIONERS VERSUS CLETUS SUDI JUMA………….…………............…..RESPONDENT RULING [1]. When ADRIAN WEKESA MUGANDA died on 15/05/2007, his sons FREDRICK WAFULA WEKESA (1st Petitioner) and CYRIL SUDI WEKESA (2nd Petitioner) petitioned for grant of letters of administration on 4th December 2014. However, before the grant could be confirmed CLETUS SUDI JUMA filed an objection on 17/12/2014 which was only served on the 1st Petitioner. [2]. The 2nd Petitioner got to learn about the matter in the year 2016 after he checked at the registry to establish the progress of the file. It is the petitioners contention that two years have lapsed and the objector has not prosecuted his objection, and urges this court to dismiss it. [3]. The respondent/objector was served with this application dated 22/06/2016 seeking dismissal of his objection on 06/12/2016 through his last known address, the document has never been returned unclaimed. A perusal of the court record shows the file has been dormant since it was filed and only came up on 02/03/2017 at the motion of the applicant. The only inference I can draw is that the objector has list interest in the motion, so his objection dated 17/12/2014 be and is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. Delivered and dated this 12th day of July, 2017 Bungoma. H. A. OMONDI JUDGE.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.