Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Simon Wanjala Wanyonyi v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2017 SIMON WANJALA WANYONYI …............APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …..........................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. By his motion dated 17th October 2016 the applicant prays that file No. 100 of 2015 be transferred from court No. 2 in the lower court to any other court. His argument basically is that he wants the same transferred as he was unable to prosecute the same due to the death of his grandfather and sister respectively. 2. The state has opposed the same arguing that it had no basis at all but simply delaying the finalisation of the same. 3. I have perused the proceedings in file No. 100 of 2015 and the same has substantially proceeded. I do not find any basis why the applicant wants the file to be transferred to another court. He has not raised any issues concerning the court or the prosecution on how the matter is being conducted. 4. I agree with the learned state counsel that the same is simply a delaying tactic. The application is dismissed. Let the trial court proceed expeditiously noting that the delay caused by this application has been inordinate. Delivered this 27th day of July, 2017. _________________ H.K. CHEMITEI JUDGE In the presence of; Kakoi for the respondent present Applicant – present Kirong/Silvia – Court Assistants _________________ H.K. CHEMITEI JUDGE 27/7/2017

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.