REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA CHUKA ELC [CA] CASE NO 75 OF 2017 FORMERLY MERU ELC [CA] CASE NO. 111 OF 2013 JOSEPH MIIRU KIRUMPU ………………...………… 1ST APPELLANT KITHINJI MUTITHI…….…………………………….…2ND APPELLANT MURITHI MUTITHI…………………………………….3RD APPELLANT VERSUS VERONICA GATARU GERRALD……….……….……RESPONDENT RULING 1. Parties were to come to court to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17, Civil Procedure Rules. 2. The appeal had also been listed for dismissal in terms of order 42 Rule 35(2) Civil Procedure Rules. 3. On 25thJuly, 2017, the Respondent asked the court to dismiss the appeal. 4. Two appellants were not in court and no explanation was given for their absence. The one in court Joseph Miiru Kirumpu did not give to court any reason why the Appeal should not be dismissed. 5. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. 6. It is so ordered. Delivered in open court at Chuka this 25th day of July, 2017 in the presence of: CA: Ndegwa Joseph Miiru Kirumpu - 1st Appellant Veronica GataruGerald – Respondent P.M. NJOROGE JUDGE
Original judgment
Joseph Miiru Kirumpu & 2 others v Veronica Gataru Gerrald
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.