Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Anthony Kiplangat

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYAAT NANYUKI CRIMINAL CASE NO. 7 OF 2016 REPUBLIC …………………….… STATE VERSUS ANTHONY KIPLANGAT …..ACCUSED RULING 1. ANTHONY KIPLAGAT having pleaded not guilty to a murder charge is presently going through his trial. He has applied that he be released on bail now for the third time. The two previous applications were declined because there was intimation in the probation officers report that if released on bail the accused’s life would be in danger from members of the community in Nanyuki. The court also declined because there was a concern of the investigating officer and the deceased’s son that the accused could interfere with witness who are known to him. 2. The accused in making this third application for bail has failed to show to the court, circumstances, the basis upon which the court previously declined to grant bail has change. 3. The prosecution’scase is still on going. Since there are prosecution’s witnesses who have not yet testified there is the possibility of the accused interfering with those witnesses. In addition the risk posed to the accused, if he is release is still very real. 4. In view of the above there is no basis for reviewing the accused’s bail. The application for review is declined. Dated and Delivered at Nanyuki this 4th October 2017 MARY KASANGO JUDGE CORAM Before Justice Mary Kasango Court Assistant:Njue/Mariastella For the State: …......................................... For accused: ……………………………..

page 1 of 2

Accused: Anthony Kiplangat …………… COURT Ruling delivered in open court. MARY KASANGO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.