Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Karumba Longonyek

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CRIMINAL CASE NO 61 OF 2016 REPUBLIC Versus KARUMBA LONGONYEK……………….…………ACCUSED RULING Bail [1] On 18th September, 2017, Mr.Wamache, the legal counsel for the accused person applied for her client to be released on bail which is his constitutional right. The prosecution did not oppose his release on bond, except they insisted that he should be released on adequate security being provided. They opposed release on cash bail because the area he comes from is vast and posed real possibility of him absconding. DETERMINATION [2] I have considered the pre-bail report dated 4 th July 2017. It recommends the accused to be considered for release on bond with adequate security. I note from the report that the accused is polygamous with two wives and ten children. Some children are young and others are in primary school. It also seems that there is healed or cordial relationship among the clan members. At this juncture I should state that the vastness of the area a person comes from should not be interpreted to mean that the person will abscond.This is just a geographical reality. The prosecution should adduce cogent evidence with specific details which shows that the person will abscond rather than making a generalized statement that due to the vastness of the area he comes from, there is real possibility of absconding. In this case, I find nothing in the report which indicates that the accused is a flight risk or is likely to abscond. Therefore, there is absolutely no compelling reason which would prevent the release of the accused on bond or bail upon reasonable terms in accordance with article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution. The purpose of bail or bond is to procure or guarantee attendance of the accused during his trial. Therefore, reasonable conditions should always be granted except only in cases where there are exceptional factors to justify imposition of stringent conditions. I do not find any such exceptional circumstances and I order that the accused shall be released on cash bail of Kshs. 100,000 or bond of Kshs. 200,000 with one surety of similar amount. It is so ordered. Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Meru this 20th day of September 2017 -----------------------------F. GIKONYO JUDGE In the presence of: Mr.Namiti for state Mr. Igweta for accused

page 1 of 2

-----------------------------F. GIKONYO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.