Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2445 of 2017

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MAKUENI ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 35, 38, 48, 81, 86 AND 88 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTIONS ACT NO. 24 OF 2011 LAWS OF KENYA, THE ELECTIONS (GENERAL) REGULATIONS, 2012, THE ELECTIONS (TECHNOLOGY) REGULATIONS, 2017 AND THE ELECTIONS (PARLIAMENTARY AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION OFFENCES ACT NO. 37 OF 2016 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT NO. 31 OF 2016 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION ACT NO.9 OF 2011 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE MEMBER OF NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS FOR KIBWEZI EAST CONSTITUENCY HELD ON 8TH AUGUST 2017 BETWEEN PHILIP KYALO KITUTI KALOKI......................PETITIONER/APPLICANT -VERSUSTHE INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION RESPONDENT..............1ST RESPONDENT THE RETURNING OFFICER, KIBWEZI EAST CONSTITUENCY.................................2ND RESPONDENT

page 1 of 2

JESSICA NDUKU KIKO MBALU....................................3RD RESPONDENT Pursuant to the agreement of all the parties on the issue of the ruling/order made on 10/11/2017, the court makes the following orders:ORDER 1. Order (b) (c) (d) and (e) will be amended and/ or corrected to include Petitioner as the party to be supplied and/ or access the information sought thereof. 2. Prayer (d) will also be corrected to read copies of polling day diaries. 3. The implementation of order (h) time/period is corrected to read 21 days. Orders accordingly. SIGNED, DATED AND ISSUED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017. C. KARIUKI JUDGE ………………………………….

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.