Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2389 of 2017

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HGH COURT OF KENYA HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 96 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HARRISON THIONGO NDEGWA alias THIONGO NDEGWA (DECEASED) JOHN KARUTHI THIONGO............APPLICANT -V E R S U S JAMES KARIUKI.........................RESPONDENT RULING What is before me is the summons for rectification of grant dated 5/6/2014 seeking orders; 1. That the certificate of confirmation of grant issued herein to the applicant on 20/12/13 be rectified indicating the name Joseph Kiruhi Mathenge instead of Joseph Kirichu Mathenge 2. Costs be in the cause. It is supported by the affidavit shown by the administrator/applicant Peninah Wanjiru Mathenge who avers that the grant was confirmed on 20/12/13 contained errors in the description of one of the beneficiaries whose name was given as JOSEPH KIRUHI MATHENGE instead of JOSEPH KIRICHU MATHENGE. Rectification of grant is provided for under s.74 of Laws of Succession Act and Rule 43 of the Probate and Administration Rules – where the court is empowered to amend on the grant including the names and description of any person – I have perused the entire record – I have found no particulars of Peninah Wanjiru Mathenge as the administrator nor any particulars of one Joseph Kirichu Mathenge what is on the file is a grant issued to John Kariithi Thiongo on 4/2/2011. I think this application is misplaced as it has nothing to do with all the other pleadings in the file. The same is struck out. Dated, Signed and delivered at this 13th Day of June 2017 at Nyeri. TERESIA MATHEKA JUDGE In the presence of, Mr. King’ori for the applicant Court Assistant …. Harriet

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.