Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2344 of 2017

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 302 0F 2012 In the Matter of the Estate of the Late M’ Itirai Kamakia Alias Ithirai Kamakia (Deceased) STEPHEN MARANGU M’ ITIRAI.……………….........…....................PETITIONER -VERSUSSILVERIA NCECE M’ IRURA…..…………………..….........……..1ST OBJECTOR SARAH NAITORE…………..……………………...……….......…2ND OBJECTOR MARIETA NDURU MWIRIGI……………………......………....…3RD OBJECTOR BEATRICE MWARI……………………………….....………….....4TH OBJECTOR ELIZABETH MUGURE…………………………...……..................5TH OBJECTOR JUDGMENT [1] In a Summons dated 15th November 2016, the Objectors seeks for the following orders: 1. That the Grant of Probate for Letters of Administration intestate made to the said Sarah Naitore and Stephen Marangu on 30th April 2015 be confirmed. 2. That the Estate of the deceased be distributed in terms of paragraph 5 of the Petitioner’s Affidavit and the consent letter annexed thereto. 3. That the costs of this application be in the cause. Though not material defect, it is worth to mention that the provisions of the law under which the application is premised has not been stated. Nevertheless, the Objectors case is that the identification and shares of all persons beneficially entitled to the said estate have been ascertained and determined as per paragraph 5 of the Affidavit in support of the Summons sworn by the 2nd Objector. [2] When the matter came up for hearing on 14 th March 2017, Mr. Mugambi, legal counsel for the Petitioner intimated to court that he had instructions to file a protest to the instant application and requested for 14 days to do so. The court obliged and the matter was scheduled for mention on 26 th April 2017 to assign it a date for judgment. On 26th April 2017, Mr. Wanjohi holding brief for Mr. Mugambi

page 1 of 3

for the Petitioner informed the court that Mr. Mugambi would file his proposed mode of distribution by 3rd May 2017 and requested more time to do so. The court observed that Mr. Mugambi was in default but nonetheless allowed him up to 3rd May 2017 to file his client’s mode of distribution but with strict admonition that the court would determine the application regardless of whether or not he had filed his client’s mode of distribution. Parties and legal counsels should always know that they are under a duty to assist the Court to further the overriding objective of the law and participate in the processes of the Court and to comply with the directions and orders of the Court in order to facilitate the just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of disputes. I must note that Mr. Mugambi for the Protestor has not up to date filed his client’s mode of distribution despite having been given ample time to do so. Such party is not a diligent suitor of justice and shall not be allowed to hold the court at ransom or benefit from his own default. I will however consider the law and the proposals by the Objector. DETERMINATION [3] I have carefully perused the record and the material placed before this court. I have also considered the law applicable. The beneficiaries gave their formal consent to the mode of distribution of estate and confirmation of grant. Accordingly, I confirm the Grant of Letters of Administration issued to Sarah Naitore and Stephen Marangu on 30th April 2015; and distribution of the Estate of the deceased shall be in accordance with paragraph 5 of the 2nd Objectors affidavit as follows:LAND PARCEL NO. ABOTHUGUCHI/L-KAONG/32 NAME NO OF SHARES 1. MARIETA NDURU MWIRIGI 3.9188 2. SARAH NAITORE 3. JAMES MUTWIRI & CHARLES MURANGIRI 3.9188 4. BEATRICE NTHUNI RIMIRI 3.9188 5. SILVERIA NCECE 3.9188 6. ELIZABETH MUGURE 3.9188 7. MICHAEL ROBERT 1 ACRE 8. STEPHEN MARANGU 1 ACRE 9. EVANGELINE KAIMENYI 3.9188 1 ACRE LAND PARCEL NO. ABOTHUGUCHI/KIIJA/68 1. MARIETA NDURU MWIRIGI 3.186 2. SARAH NAITORE 3. JAMES MUTWIRI & CHARELS MURANGIRI 3,186 4. BEATRICE NTHUNI RIMIRI 3,186 5. SILVERIA NCECE 3,186 3,186

page 2 of 3

6. ELIZABETH MUGURE 3,186 7. MICHAEL ROBERT 2.25 8. STEPHEN MARANGU 2.25 9. EVANGELINE KAIMENYI 2.25 LAND PARCEL NO. ABOTHUGUCHI/L-KIIJA/190 1. MARIETA NDURU MWIRIGI 1.36 2. SARAH NAITORE 3. JAMES MUTWIRI & CHARLES MURANGIRI 1.36 4. BEATRICE NTHUNI RIMIRI 1.36 5. SILVERIA NCECE 1.36 6. ELIZABETH MUGURE 1.36 7. MICHAEL ROBERT 1.35 8. STEPHEN MARANGU 1.35 9. EVANGELINE KAIMENYI 1.36 1.35 [4] This being a succession matter, there will be no order as to costs. Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Meru this 4th day of October 2017 ------------------F. GIKONYO JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Kithinji advocate for Mr.Mugambi advocate for petitioner Petitioner – present Mr. Mutegi advocate for A.G. Riungu for Objectors All other parties – present ----------------F. GIKONYO JUDGE

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.