REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATIONCASE NO. 41 & 42 OF 2017 FREDRICK NTOITI MUTURA .………...………... 1STAPPLICANT STEPHEN GICHUNGE KIMATHI……….…….… 2ND APPLICANT Versus REPUBLIC ………..………..……….…………… RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have before me two application by way of Notice of Motion dated 7 th September, 2017 by Nicholas Gituma Kimathi and Stephen Gichunge Kimathi. Both applications are seeking leave to file appeal to the Court of Appeal out of time. Each application is supported by the affidavit of the Applicant. In such applications the applicant must show good cause why he did not enter the appeal in time; and such factors as his inability to obtain copy of the judgment or order appealed against, and copy of record of the trial is of paramount importance. 2. Applying the above test, the delay herein is two days shy of 2 years as the judgment being appealed against was delivered on 13th October 2015. The Appellants argue that they filed their appeals in time except there was a problem between the prison documentation office and the court registry. There is no evidence of the alleged problem between the prison office and the registry. However, in the course of things, it is not strange that there could be breakdown of communication between the prison office and the court registry. Again, these two persons are faced with death penalty and it is only fair that they are given an opportunity to contest their conviction and sentence.In the circumstances, I allow the two applications. Each applicant shall file appeal within 14 days of the date of this Ruling. DATED and DELIVERED at MERU this 10th day of October, 2017. -------------------F. GIKONYO JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.