Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2096 of 2017

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 280 OF 2012 In the Matter of the Estate of Gachoki Muchairu (Deceased) LOYFORD MUTURI KARIBA……………………1ST ADMINISTRATOR GODFREY MUCHIRI KABIRA ………………….2ND ADMINISTRATOR -VSCHARLES RENJI MUCHIRA…………………… 1ST OBJECTOR ALBANO MUCHIRA KARIBA…………………..… 2ND OBJECTOR JUDGMENT Confirmation of grant [1] Before me are Summons for Confirmation of Grant of Letters of Administration intestate dated 27 th August 2015, in which the Administrators seeks the following orders: (a) THAT the honourable court be pleased to confirm the Grant before the expiry of the mandatory six months as required by law. (b) THAT a Grant of Letters of Administration made to Loyford Muturi Kariba and Charles Renji Muchira on 2nd June 2015, be now confirmed. (c) THAT the estate of the deceased be distributed as per paragraph 7 of the supporting affidavit. (d) THAT the costs of this application be provided for. [2] The Applicant had stated that no objection has been filed and that there are no other dependants of the deceased surviving to claim the assets of the estate. In addition, liabilities of the deceased have been mentioned in paragraph 7 of the supporting affidavit. However, the Objectors filed a Protest contending inter alia: (1) That they were not consulted; (2) That they were not party to the proposed subdivision of the estate;

page 1 of 3

(3) That one of the sons of the deceased Sebastian Mutugi Gachoki had not been given any land at all; and (4) That further L.R Abogeta/U-Kithangari /672 did not exist as it was subdivided a long time ago. [3] I find averments which are Contrary to the Objectors assertions. Sebastian Mutugi in a Replying Affidavit filed in court on 18th July 2017 in support of Summons for Confirmation of Grant deposed that he is a son of the deceased and therefore a beneficiary of the estate. He averred further that he had already benefited from the estate of the deceased as he had inherited 1½ acres entitled to him from his grandfather’s estate in succession cause No. 378 of 1994. Therefore, he had no claim in the suit property as he had already benefited from his father. He further stated that the Objectors who were his brothers had been equally provided for. [5] Sebastian Mutugi appeared in court on 18 th July 2017, and confirmed to court that he had no interest in the suit property. Therefore, allegations by the Objectors that he had not been given any land fall by the wayside. Again, their allegations that the suit property did not exist was also settled on27 th September 2016 when the advocates for the parties agreed that the suit property is Abogeta/U Kithangari/672. The court will proceed on that basis. [6] Now I have heard Sabastian; he says he has no interest in the estate as he had already been provided for. He also stated that the Objectors, who are hos brothers were equally provided for. I have no reason to doubt him. I have also carefully considered the protest and the evidence before the court and I come to the conclusion that the protest has no merit and is hereby dismissed. There is nothing to prevent confirmation of the grant herein. Accordingly, I allow the Summons for Confirmation of Grant. The Grant of Letters of Administration made to Loyford Muturi Kariba and Charles Renji Muchira on 2 nd June 2015, is hereby confirmed. The estate shall be distributed in accordance with paragraph 6 the affidavit in support and more specifically, as follows:LAND PARCEL NO. ABOGETA/U-KITHANGARI/672 a) Muthoni Gachoki ½ Acre b) Thomas Mwaniki Gikunda ¼ Acre c) Fredrick Kithinji Albano ¼ Acre Balance thereof to be shared equally among:d) Charles Renji Muchira e) Albano Muchira Kariba f) Godfrey Muchiri Kariba g) Patrick Nkunja Kariba h) Loyford Muturi This being a succession matter, there will be no order as to costs. Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Meru this 13th day of November 2017 --------------------------------------------------F. GIKONYO

page 2 of 3

JUDGE In the presence of: Muthomi advocate for B.G. Kariuki for Objector Mutuma advocate for Arithi advocate for Petitioner --------------------------------------------------F. GIKONYO JUDGE

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.