Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Eunice Wambui Njeri

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI HIGH COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO. 108 OF 2014 REPUBLIC …………………………………PROSECUTION VERSUS EUNICE WAMBUI NJERI.......................................ACCUSED RULING ON SENTENCE 1. The accused has been convicted of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code. 2. I have considered that the State has treated her as a first offender which I have considered. 3. The defence counsel Mr. Njiri has made a passionate plea on behalf of the accused in mitigation which I have considered thus: a) Accused is remorseful for offence; b) Accused is an orphan; c) She has 2 children aged 5 years and 1 ½ years. The latter who was born while accused was in custody and has persistent chest problems. d) That the accused has been in custody during pendency of this trial. e) That the accused learnt skills while in prison including making soap and youghurt. f) That accused has gone through rehabilitation while in prison. g) That accused pleads for a non-custodial sentence. 4. I have also considered the circumstances of the case. I take a serious view of it. The accused battered an innocent child left in her care until she died of the injuries the accused inflicted on her. That was inhuman, heinous and callous. It cannot be countenanced by this court even if the court had a discretion in sentencing. 5. The offence of murder attracts a mandatory death sentence provided under section 204 of the Penal Code. 6. Accordingly I sentence the accused to death. She has the right of appeal against the conviction and

page 1 of 2

sentence within 14 days. DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2017. LESIIT, J JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.