Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Marryann Nyaga Wanjiru v Independent Electoral Boundaries Commission & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION No. 3 Of 2017 MARRYANN NYAGA WANJIRU.............................................................APPLICANT VERSUS INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES COMMISSION....1st RESPONDENT JUBILEE PARTY.............................................................................2nd RESPONDENT CHRISTOPHER MARK MWANGI..............................................INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. The applicant MARRYANN NYAGA WANJIKU by her application dated 4th September, 2017 sought leave to apply for orders of Certiorari to quash the decision of Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (I E B C) to gazette the list of nominated members of County Assembly of Laikipia. 2. By a notice dated 4th October 2017 the applicant withdrew the whole suit. 3. I E B C submitted before court, in the absence of the applicant, that it is entitled to costs. 4. It is an established principle of law that a successful party is entitled to costs. It is also a principle of law that costs follow the event. The court however always retains the discretion to award or not to award such costs. 5. The applicant filed the present action and when confronted with a Preliminary Objection of I E B C withdrew the case. Undoubtedly I E B C which incurred expenses filing the Preliminary Objection and preparing for hearing is in my view entitled to costs. There is no conduct of I E B C which would lead this court to find that it is unentitled to costs. Accordingly I order the applicant to pay the costs of this suit to I E B C which costs shall be determined through taxation. Dated and Delivered at Nanyuki this 14th December, 2017 MARY KASANGO

page 1 of 2

JUDGE Coram Before Justice Mary Kasango Court Assistant: Njue/Mariastella Applicant ……………………………………………………… 1st Respondent ……………………………………………… 2nd Respondent ……………………………………………… Interested Party ……………………………………………… COURT Ruling delivered in open court MARY KASANGO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.