REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 2 OF 2004 IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF CONSTITUTION RIGHTS FREEDOMS AND GUARANTEES UNDER ARTICLE 22. 40(B) & 47 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010 ISAIAH MBAABU (suing through athimaba clan..........................1ST PETITIONER PASQURE MUKETHA (suing through Athimaba clan.................2nd PETITIONER IBRAHIM KARANI( Suing through Nkula Clan............................3RD PETITIONER VERSUS THE LAND & SETTLEMENT OFFICER SOUTH DISTRICT....1ST RESPONDENT HON ATTORNEY GENRAL...........................................................2 ND RESPONDENT KOBIA BAIMURI................................................................................3 RD RESPONDENT MATE KABERIA BAIBIRI..................................................................4 TH RESPONDENT PAUL SOLOMON MIRITI.....................................................................5 TH RESPONDNET RULING On 19.07.17 the Court gave directions to the effect that the Ruling on two Preliminary Objections be delivered on 11.10.17 Respondents were directed to file Submissions by the close of business on that day. The submissions filed by the petitioners are in respect of Preliminary Objection of 09:04:2014 and the application of 12.03.14. For the 3rd -4th and 5th Respondent, their Submissions are in respect of the Preliminary Objection of 09:04:14 and the application dated 12.05.14. Against this background, the Court is not able to deliver a ruling. Counsels representing the parties herein are given further clarification. DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT MERU THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 IN THE PRESENCE OF:CA: Janet HON. L.N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.