Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 492 of 2017

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL CASE NO. 13 OF 2017 (in the matter of an intended Appeal Between NICHOLAS MWENDA MARANGU.................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC....................................................................RESPONDENT RULING I have considered the applicant for leave to appeal out of time. The reason advanced in the Affidavit in Support is that the relatives who were to assist the Applicant in lodging the appeal lacked money. That to me is plausible reason given the economic situation of most of our people. Poverty should not be a bar to a person’s quest for justice. Further, the sentence is for 10 years which is a long time. In this regard, I allow the application. The Petition of Appeal is hereby admitted as duly filed with leave. Let the registry open a new file for the appeal and call for proceedings of the lower Court file to process the appeal. This file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017 A. MABEYA JUDGE 28/03/2017

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.