Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 234 of 2017

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL CASE NO. 9 OF 2017 (in the matter of an intended Appeal Between JOEL MIRIKA ................................................... APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ..................................................... RESPONDENT RULING I have considered the application and the Affidavit in Support. The reason advanced for the delay is that the family of the Applicant failed to secure the services of an Advocate as expected due to financial constraints. I consider that to be a plausible reason when coupled with the sentence of 20 years metted out to the Applicant. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The Petition of appeal is deemed to be filed with leave. Let the Petition be served upon the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). The registry to open an Appeal file. This file be closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017 A. MABEYA JUDGE 29/03/2017

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.