REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 94 OF 2014 REPUBLIC................................STATE VERSUS MARY ATAI.......................ACCUSED RULING The accused MARY ATAI faces a charge of murder. The prosecution having closed its case, the accused was called upon to give her defence and she did duly make an unsworn defence. The matter is now pending before me for judgment. I note that during the trial no doctor came to court to give evidence in the matter. Due to the lengthy doctor’s strike and being unable to predict when doctors would resume duty the post-mortem report was admitted into evidence by consent. However having read the record I am of the opinion that it is necessary to obtain the evidence of a doctor to enable the court reach a just conclusion in this matter. Section 150 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides that “150 A court may at any stage of a trial or other proceeding under this code, summon or call any person as a witness or examine any person in attendance though not summoned as a witness, or recall and re-examine a person already examined, and the court shall summon and examine or re-call and re-examine such person if his evidence appears to it essential to the just decision of the case….” It is my considered opinion that the evidence of the pathologist is essential to the just decision of this particular case. Invoking the above provision of law I hereby direct that Dr. Titus Ngulungu who prepared the post-mortem report in this case be summoned to give evidence on the same before I prepare my judgment. Summons to issue as directed. Read in open court Mr. Obutu holding brief for Mr. Mongeri Mr. Chigiti for DPP Court – Summons to issue to Dr. Titus Ngulungu. Hearing on 25/10/2017. Maureen A. Odero Judge 13/10/2017
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.