Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Timothy Isaac Bryant & 2 others v Inspector General of Police & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2013 TIMOTHY ISAAC BRYANT.................................................................1ST.APPLICANT GITONGA GERRY GRAHAM...............................................................2NDAPPLICANT (Both practicing law in the firm of Bryant & Associates) REGISTERED TRUSTEES KENYA YOUTH HOSTELS ASSOCIATION...................................................................3RDAPPLICANT VERSUS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE...............................................1STRESPONDENT DIRECTOR OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS DEPARTMENT.....2NDRESPONDENT ADAN AHMED HASSAN.................................................................3RDRESPONDENT AND DESIRAL COMPANY LIMITED..............................................1STINTERESTED PARTY JAMES OSOGO.....................................................................2NDINTERESTED PARTY GIDEON CHRIS MAINA..........................................................3RDINTERESTED PARTY MUSA MUKANGWA...............................................................4THINTERESTED PARTY FRANCIS MUTHINI.................................................................5THINTERESTED PARTY RULING On 27th June 2014, this court ordered the Applicants to deposit in court a sum of Kshs.23 million pending the hearing and determination of the dispute involving the ownership of the same. On 2 nd August 2016, the 2nd, 3rd, 4th & 5th Interested Parties applied to this court to have the said sum of money transferred from the court’s account to an interest bearing account at Kenya Commercial Bank Nairobi High Court

page 1 of 2

Branch in the joint names of the Deputy Registrar of the High Court, Criminal Division Nairobi and Lawrence M. Mbabu & Associates, the advocates for Kenya Youth Hostels Association. The grounds in support of the application are stated on the face of the application. In summary, there are pending police investigations in respect of the ownership of the said sum of money. Pending the conclusion of the investigations, the said Interested Parties requested the court for the said sum of money deposited in an interest earning account. The application is not opposed. However, the Applicants have indicated that the account to be opened should include them as signatories of the account. This court heard rival submission made by Mr. Mbabu for the Interested Parties, Mr. Laichena for the 1 st Interested Party and Mr. Saende for the Applicants. It was clear to this court that there is no dispute between the parties regarding the request made by the said Interested Parties for the said sum of money to be transferred from the court’s account to an interest earning account to be opened. Mr. Mbabu is vehement in his insistence that the Applicants should be excluded from being signatories of the interest earning account. Mr. Saende on his part explained that the issue as to who is entitled to the said sum of money is yet to be resolved. It is in the interest of all the parties that the Applicants be made signatories of the joint account to be opened. The parties to this application concede that the issue regarding the ownership of the money is yet to be determined by the court. There are ongoing criminal investigations that have not been completed. It is only just and fair that the interest bearing account to be opened should have all the protagonists as joint signatories. In the premises therefore, the application for the sum of Kshs.23 million to be transferred from the court’s account to an interest bearing account at Kenya Commercial Bank High Court Branch Nairobi is hereby allowed. The interest bearing account shall be opened in the names of the Deputy Registrar Criminal Division Nairobi, Lawrence M. Mbabu & Associates and Bryant & Associates. It is so ordered. DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016 L. KIMARU JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.