Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Praful Kumar Lakhani & 1 other v Stephen Ndirangu Waweru

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT ELC. CASE NO. 686 OF 2011 PRAFUL KUMAR LAKHANI..….…………….............. PLAINTIFF VERSUS STEPHEN NDIRANGU WAWERU…..…..………………DEFENDANT RULING I have studied the Notice of Motion dated 29 th January 2015 and its accompanying Affidavit sworn by the Plaintiff, sworn on 28th January 2015. The Plaintiff seeks an extension of time within which to file a witness statement of Paul Mutie to 17/4/14. In response, the Defendant filed his response by way of a “Supporting Affidavit” Sworn on 22/4/14. He opposes the Plaintiffs application. Both parties filed their written submissions which I have perused. I see no big contest here considering that this matter has not yet been certified ready for a hearing. Accordingly, parties are still open and allowed to comply with the provisions of order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rule, 2010. No prejudice will be suffered by the Defendant if I allow this application as they are at liberty to file my other witness statements or documents they wish to in response to Mr. Paul Mutie’s witness statement. Accordingly, I hereby allow this application. Costs in the cause. Parties to be allocated a date for pre-trial conference to pave way for the trial. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 2016. MARY M. GITUMBI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.