Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Maurice Aldous Opar v Trinity Prime Investments Limited & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 1492 OF 2000 MAURICE ALDOUS OPAR……………………………………………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS TRINITY PRIME INVESTMENTS LIMITED………………………..…..1ST DEFENDANT ERICK ANANDA…………………………………..………….………….2ND DEFENDANT JOSEPHINE MONGARE T/A.J.W WAMBUA & CO. ADVOCAT…………………………….…….3RD DEFENDANT JOSEPH NGEROGENGE NJOROGE T/A JANEN MAROA AGENCIES………………………..……………….4TH DEFENDANT RULING I have considered the submissions made on the application before me dated the 14 th of March 2016 and what is stated in the affidavits. I grant 4 of the application and on prayer 3 I will extend the period to only 45 days from today. If the applicant does not vacate within 45 days from today then the 1 st defendant/plaintiff is at liberty to evict the plaintiff. Dated signed and delivered this 21st day of April 2016 R. E. OUGO JUDGE In the presence of: …………………….…………….……..……………………………….FOR THE PLAINTIFF ………………………..……………..…….….…………………………FOR THE 1ST DEFENDANT

page 1 of 2

……………………………………….………………..………………… FOR THE 2ND DEFENDANT …….………………………………….……………….……………….FOR THE 3RD DEFENDANT …………………………………………….……..……………………… FO THE 4TH DEFENDANT M/S CHARITY COURT CLERK

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.